This is an old revision of this page, as edited by SilverLocust (talk | contribs) at 06:39, 7 November 2024 (→Arbitration case request declined: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 06:39, 7 November 2024 by SilverLocust (talk | contribs) (→Arbitration case request declined: new section)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)What, again?
What, again? Sorry to see this, Andy. Bishonen | tålk 18:27, 3 November 2024 (UTC).
A barnstar for you
|
The Anti-Wikibullying Barnstar |
| We may not have seen eye to eye in the past, but I was pleasantly surprised when I saw this. Whether you come back or not, good luck on your future endeavors! ZLEA T\ 19:55, 3 November 2024 (UTC) |
- I second that emotion. Andy, thanks for taking a stand at WPO. You can be more effective here when there are clean lines and no questions of loyalty. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 22:44, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Thirded. Dronebogus (talk) 11:25, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- I don't disagree with the stand Andy has taken, but I'm absolutely sickened by Valjean's continued insistence that we must be "loyal" to en.wp and to voice criticism of it is some sort of treason. That's absolutely not what Andy is about, as anyone with even a passing familiarity with him would know perfectly well. Just Step Sideways 00:22, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
In appreciation
|
The Surreal Barnstar | |
| Pure wildcard energy. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 12:40, 5 November 2024 (UTC) |
Arbitration case request declined
Hi AndyTheGrump. The Wikipediocracy-related conduct case request has been declined. While the arbitrators were closely divided, there was not an absolute majority to accept the case. For the Arbitration Committee, SilverLocust 💬 06:39, 7 November 2024 (UTC)