Talk:Larry Craig - Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Tom.Reding (talk | contribs) at 21:10, 12 November 2024 (→top: -activepol=no (Category:Pages using WikiProject banner shell with unknown parameters); cleanup). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 21:10, 12 November 2024 by Tom.Reding (talk | contribs) (→top: -activepol=no (Category:Pages using WikiProject banner shell with unknown parameters); cleanup)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Skip to table of contents

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Larry Craig article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Misplaced Pages? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2

Larry Craig was a good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
October 13, 2007	Good article nominee	Not listed

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This article is rated B-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Misplaced Pages's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Mid-importance).

LGBTQ+ studies

This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Misplaced Pages. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.
Explanation for inclusion in WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies: LGBT issues in the media; cottagingLGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies

Minnesota Low‑importance

	Minnesota portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Minnesota, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Minnesota on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MinnesotaWikipedia:WikiProject MinnesotaTemplate:WikiProject MinnesotaMinnesota
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics: American Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by American politics task force (assessed as Low-importance).

United States: Idaho Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.

United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by WikiProject Idaho (assessed as Low-importance).

U.S. Congress High‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is about one (or many) person(s).

This article has been mentioned by a media organization:

John J. Miller (2008-04). "Liberal Web". National Review. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)

Archives

Archive 1

Archive 2

Merger proposal

I propose to merger Larry Craig scandal with Larry Craig. I think the content can be easily accommodated on the main article. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 18:30, 26 July 2020 (UTC)

Oppose I think that these two articles are separately notable and it wouldn't make sense to fill Craig's article with too many fine details of the scandal. Mysterymanblue 09:39, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
Oppose The scandal at the time gained significant media attention and was a notable event. Given how the length of this article is basically the same as the article for the scandal it would not make sense to merge. JayJay 02:15, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Oppose It was a notable event in U.S. political history. The implications for LGBTQ, free speech, and American electoral politics, Senate ethics, etc. could not be adequately covered in the main Larry Craig article. There doesn't seem to be consensus for a merger, and this merger proposal is eight months old. Can the merger flag be removed now? Minnemeeples (talk) 19:18, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

LGBT politicians category

Now that we know that Senator Craig was, at the very least, a bi/pansexual if not a gay man, wouldn't it be right to categorise him as such? Sorry if this isn't right, not too familiar with such categories. Tony Polari (talk) 21:09, 29 October 2024 (UTC)

He has not identified as bi/pansexual or gay. That's what we go by. cheers. anastrophe, an editor he is. 21:48, 29 October 2024 (UTC)

Kinda sucks but I guess it makes sense. No arguments on whether or not a historical figure was gay or not, no guessing basically. Cheers. Tony Polari (talk) Tony Polari (talk) 17:03, 3 November 2024 (UTC)

Categories: