This is an old revision of this page, as edited by David Gerard (talk | contribs) at 21:07, 6 May 2007. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 21:07, 6 May 2007 by David Gerard (talk | contribs)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Wording
Under "purpose", David Gerard prefers the wording, "You might be wrong!" Two other editors prefer, "You might be wrong about whether or not you really have a consensus, and you will be held responsible for anything you do, regardless of the IRC discussion that preceded it." Anyone else have an opinion? --Elonka 20:28, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
- Under "purpose", one of the channel wizards worded it a given way, and zero channel wizards disputed this - David Gerard 20:41, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
- Furthermore, please reread m:Instruction creep. If they don't understand already, they're not clueful enough to be admins. - David Gerard 20:43, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
- Hmm, that's way too harsh. Sorry for being asslike there. What I mean is, this is a description of what the channel is for, and that includes assuming good judgement already exists. If we have to detail good judgement, the reader shouldn't be here. If we have to detail the penalties for cluelessness, the reader shouldn't be here. If someone proves to be clueless on the channel, I kick them off - David Gerard 21:07, 6 May 2007 (UTC)