Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Gnome (Bot) (talk | contribs) at 08:44, 17 May 2007 (Bot: notifying User:Cool Hand Luke about removal of Image:Seagull Monument in snow.jpg. Please see our non-free content policy). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Archives
Archive1–through Nov 11, 2004
Archive2–Jan 5, 2005
Archive3–Dec 1, 2006
Archive 4–Apr 13, 2007

Rofecoxib

The first sentence of the reference to the WSJ article is deleted because it is NOT supported by what the WSJ reported. The WSJ reported that an e-mail was sent to NEJM staff (it doesn't specify who) from a PR representative the night before the EOC was released. The WSJ does NOT state that the EOC was either produced or timed based on any outside advice, and the entry stating otherwise is both false and not at all supported by the source material. The WSJ language is quite careful and explicit on this matter.

You might have something about their careful language, but the article says:

"Internal emails show the New England Journal's expression of concern was timed to divert attention from a deposition in which Executive Editor Gregory Curfman made potentially damaging admissions about the journal's handling of the Vioxx study. In the deposition, part of the Vioxx litigation, Dr. Curfman acknowledged that lax editing might have helped the authors make misleading claims in the article. ..."

I think that the article might be a little sloppy in its characterizations, and you're right that it doesn't say that it was timed based on outside advice, but it was apparently timed to cast the editors in a good light; that appears to be the whole point of the article. I'll try to reqrite it a little. Cool Hand Luke 18:19, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

re: msg

you must understand that the sentence in question was originally added as a joke (by me, and i regret that), but later was restructured and even supported with a botched up "evidence" by someone with a vested interest of laundering the effects of msg. there is no evidence of the effects on humans being different from that on rats. the "supporting study" that i keep deleting is a non-scientific SURVEY. GIMME A BREAK! some freakin SURVEY is used to PROVE that msg does not cause obesity in people???

just flip a few weeks back in the history and you will see how the original subsection appeared.

It was a scientific survey of 4938 ethnically Japanese men in Hawaii that was involved in the Honolulu heart program. In addition to interviews and self-reported symptoms, they drew blood measuring glucose and cholesterol levels in the participants. That said, I appreciate that you're not making personal attacks. Cool Hand Luke 00:19, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

1. A good-natured editor has removed this user's attack. Cool Hand Luke 22:18, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
2. Continued trolling. Cool Hand Luke 03:38, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
3. Still trolling, still hasn't bothered to fix the typos. Cool Hand Luke 15:50, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
4. *sigh* Cool Hand Luke 18:10, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
5. Blah blah blah — RevRagnarok 13:14, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
6. ect. Cool Hand Luke 13:41, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

hey you, cool cock licker

I'm back motherfucker, so taste my sperm, you motherfucking faggot.

FUCK YOU IN YOUR MSG-EATIN THROAT... EAT SHIT AND DIE! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.131.159.97 (talk) 02:12, 14 May 2007 (UTC).

Image:Encyclopedia of Mormonism.jpg

Hello, Cool Hand Luke. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:Encyclopedia of Mormonism.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Cool Hand Luke/Photos. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 02:11, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

Image:Seagull Monument in snow.jpg

Hello Cool Hand Luke, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as fair use. The image (Image:Seagull Monument in snow.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Cool Hand Luke/Photos. This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not readd the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the Creative Commons or GFDL license or released to the public domain. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 08:44, 17 May 2007 (UTC)