This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Bjrobinson (talk | contribs) at 16:22, 18 May 2007. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 16:22, 18 May 2007 by Bjrobinson (talk | contribs)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)... but how...
Brain Splurge
There is now ‘’very’’ little left of the previously interesting and quite informative category browser based games. This massacre has been of pretty epic proportions, I believe it used to include about 50 odd pages, and has now been reduced to during my 3pm tea break romps around WP at work, I often stumble across similar categories which err on the popular side of culture rather than any sciences… a few of them are heading for exactly the same fate, one in particular has 170 Articles, i
The problem is, to be mentioned in ‘verifiable’, or ‘third party’ sources, browser games have to be much more than ‘notable’ they have to be positively ‘significant’ within the context of their peers. As we have discussed over
Lets consider Inselkampf a game with an interesting and significant community, which makes it onto the front page of Digg, has real world currency spent upon it,
Cybernations is another good example of a game which is ‘’clearly’’ notable
To summarise what we have discussed over the last few weeks
What is to be done? Someone