This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Leebo (talk | contribs) at 20:31, 24 May 2007 (you asked about this...). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 20:31, 24 May 2007 by Leebo (talk | contribs) (you asked about this...)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)User_talk:GordonWatts/Archive01
User_talk:GordonWatts/Archive02
User_talk:GordonWatts/Archive03
User_talk:GordonWatts/Archive04
User_talk:GordonWatts/Archive05
User_talk:GordonWatts/Archive06
User_talk:GordonWatts/Archive07
|
This user has been blocked indefinitely from editing Misplaced Pages. (see: block log • contributions • page moves • current autoblocks) |
+ replies to Bish, Michael
(cur) (last) 00:00, 23 May 2007 Bishonen (Talk | contribs) m (Protected User talk:GordonWatts: Protecting seems overkill. I recommend everybody who hates to read Gordon's arguments to avert their eyes.
- Thank you for the suggestion, Bish. That is what I had asked others to do in the first place -to actually read the other person's argument.--GordonWatts 20:33, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
Gordon, I recommend you to post with restraint, or it will be protected again.
- I try *always* to post with restraint (e.g., polite, assume good faith, no curse words, foul language, etc.) even if others don't do so.--GordonWatts 20:33, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit=autoconfirmed:move=autoconfirm)
- Huh? What? "Autoconfirmed?" - What do you mean? And, by corollary, what do you all mean when you write: " (anon. only, account creation blocked, autoblock disabled)?"--GordonWatts 20:33, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
(cur) (last) 00:02, 23 May 2007 Bishonen (Talk | contribs) (280 bytes) (rm protection template. Semi-protecting. Full protection seems overkill.
- I agree. It seems now days overkill happens a lot too much.--GordonWatts 20:33, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
I recommend everybody who hates to read Gordon's arguments to avert their eyes. Gordon, I recommend you to post with restraint.)
- I agree it was worth repeating.--GordonWatts 20:33, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
(cur) (last) 00:28, 23 May 2007 MichaelLinnear (Talk | contribs) (896 bytes) (removing temp category)
- Huh? I looked at your edit, and the info box seems to look the same as before. What were you trying to say, Michael?--GordonWatts 20:33, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
- One more thing: Even if I feel that I have a moral right to express my opinion just like others on their user pages, it seems that your suggestion ("Gordon, I recommend you to post with restraint") is appropriate (I agree, Bish), since the "rules" governing expression on one's user pages are not uniformly enforced -that is, enforced the same as with others, so I think I shall restrain myself from expressing opinions of any sort on this page. Can't we change that? Lack of uniformity in enforcement is unfair and wrong: The rules are "for all" --- or "not at all" -anything else is just not fair or just.--GordonWatts 20:33, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
Gordon, you asked about why the admin wrote this when blocking you "(anon. only, account creation blocked, autoblock disabled)." They didn't write that, it's the description of the parameters of your block. When users are blocked, there are different settings that the admin chooses, and they're automatically displayed there. You might ask which each parameter is, because I'm not sure myself, but it's not like the admin was trying be cryptic. Leebo /C 20:31, 24 May 2007 (UTC)