This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Filelakeshoe (talk | contribs) at 13:51, 28 May 2007 (Usernames). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 13:51, 28 May 2007 by Filelakeshoe (talk | contribs) (Usernames)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)This is Woohookitty's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
NICE EDITS!!
Thanks for the adds on Category:Film critics associations. I'll continue to put more up. ~Cnota
- Removed ].Cnota
Whoops!
Hey there I'm really sorry about that I didn't mean to move or delete anything but the ] around what I put because it was linking your talk page to that category page. I just wanted to add my comment. Again, thanks for the edits and I'm sorry about that. Cnota
The O.C. category
Since you closed this CFD with a keep, would you please use a bot to clean out all of the improperly categorized articles for cast and crew? Otto4711 20:09, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
- Can you let me know what your response to this request is, so if it's "no" I can try to find someone else to do it? Otto4711 19:19, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
Is it true.
That I can not edit my own talk page and delete certain conversations on them. Please get back to me as soon as you can! The User says I can not, but I want to check to make sure I can. Thank You for your time.(Etherroyal 18:04, 22 May 2007 (UTC))
Argentina Demographics
Thanks for your help in this matter. Cheers (DoubleNine 18:23, 22 May 2007 (UTC))
- The following was removed from your page by DoubleNine, I don't think you saw it...
- Hello. I am contacting you because I am at wit's end with a user and his puppets. You recently tagged me as being close to the 3RR rule and I notice you are an administrator. Please have a look at the recent history of talk:Argentina and talk:Demographics of Argentina. My comments on those talk pages have been revereted without merit and I am certain the following are all linked as puppets: XGustaX, 64.132.0.250, 24.60.175.168, 71.174.112.24, SouthJames, 24.60.166.114 and DoubleNine. What I wish to display is that there is some interpretation about the subject (complete with valid citations), but XGustaX and his puppets are on a mission to censor me. As DoubleNine he has also unilaterally "deleted" my comment to User talk:Dark Tea, something I am sure is against regulations. Please advise! If you think I am wrong I will back off completely. Mariokempes 17:54, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
Also, you can add Etherroyal to this list as well. NOTE TO OTHER USERS: please leave this for Woohookitty to deal with!. I will stand by his decision. Mariokempes 19:28, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
- Just a note to let you know I've alerted another administrator, user:Jossi, since I didn't know if you would receive this. Thanks, Mariokempes 19:55, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
NK War
why did you revert? have u even looked at the page, read it through? what was objectionable?
I'm not sure an indef is needed yet
In answer to your question you did correctly fix the pages however:
This user has committed page move vandalism in the past but his major issue is he moves professional wrestler articles to their current ring name without discussion. I think he's ding that in good faith out of ignorance of policy however his constant ignoring of warnings is worrisome.
"Antoni Polaski" is the current ring name of Michael Depoli which explains the moves, however the reason I requested another block is because he had previously moved this same page before and had been reverted for the same reasons. Personally I would think a block for a week, or maybe a month, should be enough for him to understand as I'm fairly sure it's ignorance not malice. –– Lid 09:52, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
Block
Could you please block me? I'd like to see if I can go through Memorial Day weekend without editing. I'll probably just create a sock puppet, but it would be nice to see how long I can make it without doing so.
Usernames
Hey there, can I just ask why User:Meooooooooooow isn't a violation of username policy? It doesn't seem to tie in with the fact that User:Chickenssssssssssssssss and User:Ahhhhhhhh were both blocked earlier that day, and the policy does say "a lengthy or apparently random sequence of characters". Cheers, - Zeibura S. Kathau 13:51, 28 May 2007 (UTC)