Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Walton One (talk | contribs) at 13:06, 29 May 2007 (have replied). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Your block

I make no comment on the justification of your block. However, you may not be aware that it is possible to appeal against it. See details here Template:Unblock. When you are unblocked I am quite prepared to work with you and help you see the best way forward for your Arbuthnot pages. I understand this must be difficult for you but a solution does have to be found. Giano 08:37, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

To my mind the block was quite inappropriate. I have never seen a COI tag on an edit and although the cavalry officer shares my name he is incredibly distant and there is no COI at all. He is table I while I am Table L (see ). But I have no plans to appeal nor to use this account again. Because it has all become too personal and nothing is being done about the stalking and the incivility. I will return when MrDarcy returns. Do what you like with articles I have contributed to. I am not that fussed. - Kittybrewster (talk) 10:26, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Illegitimi non carborundum. I hope you return soon :-) Craigy (talk) 17:26, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

• I too. Unfortunate, to say the least, that you have been bullied to the extent you have. I am preparing something on all this which I propose to place before Jimbo Wales. David Lauder 17:37, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

• • Perhaps the arbcom would be more appropriate? SqueakBox 20:23, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Hello Kittybrewster. I too hope that you return soon. The actions of some editors towards you have been disgraceful. I find it hard to understand how you can stay so calm and polite despite this. Hopefully this will soon be over and you can focus on something constructive on Misplaced Pages again. Tryde 20:12, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Email

I've replied to your email. Walton 13:06, 29 May 2007 (UTC)