Misplaced Pages

User talk:FatherTree

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by FatherTree (talk | contribs) at 17:38, 25 May 2007 (→Model and Mechanism). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 17:38, 25 May 2007 by FatherTree (talk | contribs) (→Model and Mechanism)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Reverts to your edits...also, please read Misplaced Pages policies

Yes, I did revert your edit, based on discussion on the talk page among a few editors. Please Assume Good Faith. I encourage you to read wikipedia policies on editing and also on editor conduct. RalphLender 16:20, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

And I encourage you to read them also. Please Assume Good Faith. FatherTree 16:23, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

NASW is different than the UT chaper

"WHEREAS, The physical restraint of children for purposes other than safety violates the NASW Code of Ethics, which prohibits physical contact that may be harmful; therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the National Association of Social Workers is opposed to the physical restraint of children for purposes other than safety.


— Delegate Assembly " DPeterson 22:59, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

OPEN THE PDF FILE! THAT IS THE REFERENCE. PLEASE OPEN EACH AND LOOK AT EACH THEY ARE THE SAME. FatherTree 23:21, 15 May 2007 (UTC)


'You have said your piece, please stop cluttering up my talk page with shouting and the same arguments you've already made...it's bordering on harrassment. DPeterson 23:42, 15 May 2007 (UTC)'

Sorry you interpreted that as shouting. I was trying to emphasize clearly where you are not understanding. You seem to be not working with the others and putting erroneous data on the article. I have asked you questions and you will not answer. You tell me to discuss and then you will not discuss. I feel that you seem to think you own this article. And I am allowed according to wiki rules to post on your talk page. FatherTree 12:19, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

Please stop Harrassing me

Your comments are now harrassment, please stop now. If you wish to discuss the topic, discuss it on the article talk page and leave me alone. RalphLender 15:52, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

I am not harrassing you. Look up the rules. You are saying we need consensus but refuse to discuss the points. I asked you politely many times. You simply do not want to cooperate. That is how it appears to me. FatherTree 15:55, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

Formal Mediation

This user page is currently inactive and is retained for historical reference.
If you want to revive discussion regarding the subject, you might try contacting the user in question or seeking broader input via a forum such as the village pump.
Misplaced Pages:Requests for mediation/OpenNote is deprecated. Please see User:MediationBot/Opened message instead.
The Mediation Committee has received a request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to Example. As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. The process of mediation is voluntary and focuses exclusively on the content issues over which there is disagreement. Please review the request page and the guide to formal mediation, and then indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you agree to participate. Discussion relating to the mediation request is welcome at the case talk page. Thank you,

shotwell 19:20, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Model and Mechanism

By a scientific model or a mechanism, I mean a theoretical mathematical or physical construct, which one can use to predict and formulate hypothesis about the world, so that the predictions can be experimentally tested. Does this answer your question?Vorpal Blade 17:14, 25 May 2007 (UTC)


to me model and mechanism are 2 diff things FatherTree 17:38, 25 May 2007 (UTC)