Misplaced Pages

Talk:Ann Coulter

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 209.150.212.226 (talk) at 13:23, 3 September 2003. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 13:23, 3 September 2003 by 209.150.212.226 (talk)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

So the neutrality of this page is disputed, but there are no comments here. Anyone care to chime in? Fuzheado 02:50, 3 Sep 2003 (UTC)

The article tries to show WHY Ann Coulter is controversial.

The article tries to show WHY Ann Coulter is controversial.

You can't do that by quoting her non-controversial remarks..

So yes, the article selects her controversial remarks, but an article on Ann Coulter which didn't do so would be uninformative.

Additionally, Ann Coulter frequently makes extreme statements in her writings and talk-show appearances. It's not like she rarely makes extreme statements, and this article is un-reflective. Someone could easily add ten more extreme statements she's made in the past few years.