Misplaced Pages

Talk:Tamil Nadu Muslim Munnetra Kazhagam

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by CBM (talk | contribs) at 16:22, 18 June 2007 (→Request to Unprotect: resp.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 16:22, 18 June 2007 by CBM (talk | contribs) (→Request to Unprotect: resp.)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
WikiProject iconIndia Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Misplaced Pages's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
???This article has not yet received a rating on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

terrorist

SATP lists it as such. SATP is a reliable source.Bakaman 06:23, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

Request to Unprotect

{{edit protected}}

  • The article stands protected at the POV version of Baka. Can you please revert it to the last stable version of Alverstrand here
  • Can you please add the following link and sentence: TMMK awarded the Chief Minister of Tamil Nadu for social cohesion efforts.

Anwar 12:17, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

As a matter of general policy we do not revert pages except in extreme circumstances. Please use the time that the page is protected to contact the other editors and try to reach a compromise. I don't think it is soon enough yet to unprotect the page, since I see no evidence here that the content has been discussed. — Carl (CBM · talk) 15:48, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
Does that mean, the article will continue to stand protected at the POV version of Bakasuprman who is a subject of a ongoing ArbCom case? I was reverting vandalism. I removed links to fundamentalist websites and copyvio images. SATP is a fundamentalist website. None of the articles published therein seem to be well-sourced. TMMK was awarded numerous times by the Governor of Tamil Nadu for their social schemes. You can google easily for supporting links. TMMK is not a political party. TMMK literally means Tamil Nadu Muslim Progress Movement. They awarded the Chief Minister of Tamil Nadu for social cohesion efforts. TMMK is the spokesman for minorities in Tamil Nadu. They are well-known for organising mass rallies for affirmation action. In a recent rally in Chennai, atleast 1 million Muslims participated (out of a total population of 4 million). TMMK also fought for compensation and concessions to non-Muslim victims of tsunami. There are very few organisations like TMMK that work for social unity. By tagging them as fundamentalist, Baka was pushing hysterical POV with fake tags in edit summary. He was revert warring despite being a subject of a ongoing ArbCom case.
How long will the article be protected (at his POV version) without any updates or news links? Should I wait until Bakasuprman is acquitted in the ongoing ArbCom case? Anwar 16:12, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
Yes, it means that it will stay at whatever version was protected until it is unprotected. The fact that there is a related arbcom case means that admins should be even more reluctant to edit it. I fully believe you that the protected version is not the "right" version, but the policy says that it should not be changed even if the protected version is a POV version. If you contact me when the arbitration is over or when there is consensus on this talk page about what changes should be made, I'll look into unprotecting the page. — Carl (CBM · talk) 16:22, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
Categories: