Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by El elan (talk | contribs) at 13:59, 23 June 2007. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Ambedkar revert

My revert was of a controversial edit without a source - blaming the police for the violence. The edit that was reinstated is POV and needs a good source, I agree. Rama's arrow (3:16) 16:36, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

We cannot be judgmental - blaming police is not "unencyclopedic" - what does that mean? The problem is simple - either sentence you keep has a problem in terms of needing a citation and conforming to WP:NPOV. I don't find accusations on "Dalit Buddhists" to be less or more acceptable than the police. Rama's arrow (3:16) 04:38, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

I think I have ansered it here. Nothing is more or less acceptable. What you removed as controversial can be sourced easily and what you inserted is a POV. El elan 05:58, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

And Manohar Kadam's conduct is not an issue to be covered in the biography of Ambedkar. That's something for an article on the riots. Rama's arrow (3:16) 04:39, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

You are right; this is a problem with many of the articles. But the removal on the grounds of "controversial" is not acceptable.El elan 06:53, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

Narendra Modi

Thank you for your recent edits. It would be helpful if, once done, you could put in a brief justification on the talkpage in case they are challenged. Hornplease 09:26, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

• I will be in WikiBreak soon. I have seen that discussion. But I expect it to stay as allegation of fake encounter has become (to Modi) what Anna Politkovskaya is to Vladimir Putin or Nandigram is to Buddhadeb Bhattacharya. El elan 09:22, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

El elan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I am on a wikibreak and saw today that I have been marked as a "sock puppet of Kuntan". I can only say I am not a "sock puppet of Kuntan" as no other reason has been given for my block. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I am on a wikibreak and saw today that I have been marked as a "sock puppet of Kuntan". I can only say I am not a "sock puppet of Kuntan" as no other reason has been given for my block. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I am on a wikibreak and saw today that I have been marked as a "sock puppet of Kuntan". I can only say I am not a "sock puppet of Kuntan" as no other reason has been given for my block. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

• Requests for unblock