This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Tony Sidaway (talk | contribs) at 19:58, 22 May 2005 (→[]: On my closing of the last VfD). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 19:58, 22 May 2005 by Tony Sidaway (talk | contribs) (→[]: On my closing of the last VfD)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Lorna Nogueira
This page should be deleted because as User:R. fiend states the votes were counted wrong and the person who the page was written about is no-notable and has even contacted Misplaced Pages expressing that she should not be included because of this. MichaelMoore 18:27, 22 May 2005 (UTC)
- VfD is not about vote-counting — read Misplaced Pages:Guide to Votes for deletion: "The purpose of the discussion is to achieve consensus upon a course of action. The votes are a means to gauge consensus, and not the ends in themselves (Misplaced Pages is not a democracy)."
- She didn't say that she shouldn't be included, only that she wouldn't mind if editors did delete the article on her.
- Her point wasn't based on a technicality of the voting system.
- This article has survived two VfDs this year, the last less than two months ago. What's going on here? is there something personal in the air? Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 18:56, 22 May 2005 (UTC)
- I closed the last VfD. The statement that is was closed wrong is a result of User:R. fiend's belief that a 2:1 ratio of votes to delete should result in an article's deletion. For the purpose of closing VfDs, I do not accept that 2:1 constitutes a rough consensus, so I closed the listing--and other votes with similar results--with no consensus. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 19:58, 22 May 2005 (UTC)
- Keep since it's been kept twice recently. Kappa 19:56, 22 May 2005 (UTC)