Talk:Lühhike öppetus - Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Digwuren (talk | contribs) at 09:31, 8 August 2007 (→Full title). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 09:31, 8 August 2007 by Digwuren (talk | contribs) (→Full title)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Estonia Unassessed

Lühhike öppetus is part of WikiProject Estonia, a project to maintain and expand Estonia-related subjects on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.EstoniaWikipedia:WikiProject EstoniaTemplate:WikiProject EstoniaEstonia

???

This article has not yet received a rating on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : WikiProject Estonia/Missing articles
Assess : Rate each tagged article by quality and importance to the WikiProject if it has not been done. (See Category:Unassessed Estonia articles)
Infobox : Add infoboxes to articles without it
Maintain : Portal:Estonia
Photo : Upload and/or add a photo to articles without it (See Category:Misplaced Pages requested photographs in Estonia)
Stubs : Add info to stub-articles and check for start-class.

Full title

I've held off making this change for lack of knowledge. The article begins by saying that it was called Lühhike öppetus at the time it was published, but it would be called Lühike õpetus nowadays. The "full title" as set out in the next paragraph uses a sort of hybrid orthography (Lühhike õppetus). Should the õ be replaced with an ö, since that would have been the full title when it was published, or is that wrong for some reason? BigHaz - Schreit mich an 22:17, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

My knowledge doesn't stretch beyond yours. But since Digwuren explained his moving of the page with 'ö' is the consistent transliteration. 'õ' was not yet consciously used; Masing hadn't invented it yet. I chose to be bold. --Gf1961 07:18, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

The 'õ' must have been my mistake. It seems to have been fixed by now. Digwuren 09:31, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

Categories: