Misplaced Pages

talk:Articles for deletion/Idenics - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages talk:Articles for deletion

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Justanother (talk | contribs) at 16:55, 27 August 2007 (F451s comments after some of the votes: take it to the arb). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 16:55, 27 August 2007 by Justanother (talk | contribs) (F451s comments after some of the votes: take it to the arb)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

F451s comments after some of the votes

Why do you feel the need to comment after each person you think has a "pro CoS" viewpoint? Do any of us go around commenting about your "pro Freezone" viewpoint?HubcapD 04:47, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

It is called WP:HARASS and WP:DE. --Justanother 15:37, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
I have a large collection of diffs of F451's "greatest hits", in which he stalks, insults, and baits at least twenty different editors. If anyone gets sick of his tirades eventually and wishes to lodge a major complaint against his behavior, I'd be only too happy to contribute my two cents. (Of course, he'd just say we're all obviously part of the OSA "hatchet job" conspiracy.) wikipediatrix 16:25, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
You could introduce it at the current related COFS arb if you want. Seeing as F451 has made himself a party to it and was actually the first to introduce "evidence". --Justanother 16:55, 27 August 2007 (UTC)