Misplaced Pages

Talk:The Rolling Stones/to do

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Talk:The Rolling Stones

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 72.240.44.202 (talk) at 22:08, 9 April 2007. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 22:08, 9 April 2007 by 72.240.44.202 (talk)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
  • the entire article needs to be sectionalized (try more headings and subheadings); it doesn't look or read like a summary.
  • all images need sources and fair use rationales.
  • The section titles are not written with an encyclopedic tone
  • the sections themselves are extremely long. It seems like they could be reorganized so that instead of a chronology of the band, each section focused on one element of the band and how it changed throught the band's history.
  • Lead should be a summary of the articles content, and is rather brief considering the length of the article and the 40+ years the band have existed
  • Fannish tone.
  • After cleanup, improve to good article status.
  • Eat Lunch