This is an old revision of this page, as edited by KTC (talk | contribs) at 08:48, 8 September 2007 (→Arbcom Notice: already initiated). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 08:48, 8 September 2007 by KTC (talk | contribs) (→Arbcom Notice: already initiated)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Welcome to my talk page! Please visit my company's webpage at CyclePat.ca.
 Archives |
History - Archives by permanent link
- A-101: Sep 2005 - Jan 29 2006
- A-102: Jan 29 2006 - Jan 13 2007
- A-103: Jan 13 - April 10 2007
- A-105: Apr 13 - May 29 2007
- A-106: May 29 - Sept 8 2007
In Ottawa it is currently Sunday 29 December, 04:58 (EDT).
- "I may eventually get back to you. However, if it's past midnight, I might be sleeping! Shssh! Type quietly."
Arbcom Notice
{{helpme}} Can you please post to arbcom. Further more as per WP:APB (http://en.wikipedia.org/WP:APB#Abuse_of_the_unblocking_process) Upon a request to seek arbitration, editing access may be restored to a limited number of other pages (such as those connected with their appeal) pending the formal decision, so that the matter (and any evidence, facts, mitigating circumstances, or corrections) can be presented as well. In light of this highlighted precedent I ask that I be permited to edit wikipedia as usual without mentioning AMA and that Arbcom give there final decision.
- As per WP:APB#Appeal to the Arbitration Committee, please "contact a member of the committee or an Arbitration clerk by email and ask that a request be filed on their behalf". KTC 08:33, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
- The request had already been initiated. KTC 08:48, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
Advocate Members Association (AMA)
- Initiated by CylcePat at 06:02, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
Involved parties
- CyclePat (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
- JzG (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA)
- Confirmation that all parties are aware of the request
- Confirmation that other steps in dispute resolution have been tried
Statement by CyclePat {party 1}
CyclePat has been indefinately blocked since June 3rd 2007 by the administrator JzG for allegedly trolling. There is a relationship inbetween this block and CyclePat's objection to the closure of the Association of Members Advocates (WP:AMA). After months of negotiation the blocking admin and CyclePat can not come to a resolution. The proposed solution by the blocking admin would have him promis to never mention the AMA again. There is a dead lock because CyclePat believes that he should be permitted to continue talking about that subject. Since there appears to be no concensus or resolution via regular dispute resolution methodes, JzG's block should be reviewed and brought, (and probably a long time ago), before a higher committees than just wikipedia administrators. Being given such an ultimatum, according to CyclePat, feels like persecution because of his beliefs in trying to establish a fair and equitable wikipedia system. Arbcom should step in to make a clear decision on both the AMA and CyclePat's current status.
Statement by {party 2}
Clerk notes
- (This area is used for notes by non-recused Clerks.)
Arbitrators' opinion on hearing this matter (0/0/0/0)
Hey Man
I think I need your help and support. I go an e mail from an editor asking me to look at the List_of_gay_porn_stars section. These articles are riddled with POV, advertisement and spam. I tried to do a simple prod tag but oh my did I get the thrashing of my life! These subjects are the actual editors of their pages. So, when an editor goes in to try and edit the articles, they jump on them and remove any edits they do not like. The way the WP:PORNBIO is written, all these people have to do is to win an award or be able to write something about themselves in a web page and it can be entered into WP. When you click on the links for these pages, they take you to websites that you either have to agree to enter in on adult content or it takes you to their porno stores. The only way to get around these people is to put them up for AfD. I need some help here. Do you think you would like to join forces with me to rid WP os some of this crap? Let me know. I certainly could use the support and help Junebug52 18:10, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
- thanks Bug, but I can't help you until my block is resolved. --CyclePat 08:03, 8 September 2007 (UTC)