Misplaced Pages

:Requests for adminship/Susvolans - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Requests for adminship

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 172 (talk | contribs) at 01:36, 26 June 2005. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 01:36, 26 June 2005 by 172 (talk | contribs)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Susvolans

Vote here (1/5/6) ending 18:54 1 July 2005 (UTC)

Susvolans is doing tireless work on stub sorting and vandalism patrol, and has over 6000 edits under the belt. A steadfast contributor who can be trusted to use adminity to further the wiki. Radiant_>|< 18:55, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:

Support

  1. Sarge Baldy 19:03, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)
  2. 'Support' - There's always plenty of room at the Hotel RC Patrol. --FCYTravis 19:11, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Oppose

  1. No way. -- Netoholic @ 19:35, 2005 Jun 24 (UTC)
    Any particular reason? Carbonite | Talk 19:40, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
    I've seen your comment. Voters should not be challenged. I have at this time not given detailed reasons. No amount of prodding will change that. You'll get a better explanaion when I see fit. -- Netoholic @ 22:25, 2005 Jun 24 (UTC)
    FYI, Neto told me he would explain when Sus answered the standard questions. HTH. Radiant_>|< 23:25, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)
    Thanks. That's pretty reasonable and all I wanted to know for now. Carbonite | Talk 23:27, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  2. Instantnood 19:55, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)
  3. Oppose. I can't support someone who's used their sig for panic-mongering for admin. --Carnildo 20:04, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  4. Oppose per Carnildo gkhan 11:26, Jun 25, 2005 (UTC)
  5. Oppose 172 01:35, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Neutral

  1. I want to Support, as I like Suslovans, but I don't see stub sorting as a reason to give someone an admin. Sure, it's necessary gruntwork that needs a reward, but I keep seeing it as a reason to make someone an admin. For what other reasons should I vote for Suslovans? I'm sure I'll eventually move to support but spell out why I should, please. SchmuckyTheCat 19:34, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  2. Neutral until the editor answers the standard questions. --Sn0wflake 20:31, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  3. Neutral - per Sn0wflake. --FCYTravis 21:18, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  4. Ditto. Would like to support, but the answers need answering... Grutness...wha? 23:32, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  5. Are you the same one who called me a vandal? If I'm mistaken I apologize. It was either you or someone with a similar name. Everyking 00:24, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  6. Abstain until the questions are finished. Bratsche 21:54, Jun 25, 2005 (UTC)

Comments

Questions for the candidate
A few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:

1. What sysop chores, if any, would you anticipate helping with? (Please read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.)
A.
2. Of your articles or contributions to Misplaced Pages, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
A.
3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
A.