Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Victor falk (talk | contribs) at 08:12, 9 October 2007 (:*A community development 3-page glossy brochure is hardly a ''reliable'' proof of ''notable'' economic impact, is it?--~~~~). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Sierra Vista Mall

Sierra Vista Mall (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Non-notable mall in California. A search turns up no reliable sources to verify most of the page's content. Borderline spam. Ten Pound Hammer • 17:58, 7 October 2007 (UTC)

• Delete I think that's enough to be considered spam. NASCAR Fan24 18:05, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
• comment Note that this AfD was created over the previous one which was closed as no consensus. See . JoshuaZ 18:26, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom & nascar fan. ~ | twsx | _cont | 18:31, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:N. BASE101() 18:52, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per spam. -- Magioladitis 01:09, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete can someone explain to why malls are listed on wikipedia at all?Ridernyc 17:55, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
• Keep notability is derived from economic impact - Citations and infobox added Exit2DOS2000 01:49, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

• A community development 3-page glossy brochure is hardly a reliable proof of notable economic impact, is it?--Victor falk 08:12, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

• Delete I also want to know the answer to Ridernyc's question. --Victor falk 03:11, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
• Keep, passes WP:N with a great deal of press coverage of the topic throughout its history. , even the cinema opening Kappa 03:19, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
  • If this is going be deleted as "spam" we can just make a new version anyway. Kappa 03:22, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

• AfD debates (Places and transportation)
• AfD debates