Misplaced Pages

User talk:Chimpywiki

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Chimpywiki (talk | contribs) at 15:22, 26 January 2008. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 15:22, 26 January 2008 by Chimpywiki (talk | contribs)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Notability of Wicklewood Massiv

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Wicklewood Massiv, by another Misplaced Pages user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Wicklewood Massiv seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Wicklewood Massiv, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 17:31, 25 January 2008 (UTC)


Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Misplaced Pages, as you did to Wymondham College. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- Ed (Edgar181) 21:48, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

January 2008

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Wymondham College. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Snowolf 21:53, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

Wymondham College

I'm trying to unblock these needless revertions that all the techno geeks are making to your Wymondham College contributions but I'm not sure how much luck I'll have. They are a humourless bunch. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Spongebobq (talkcontribs) 22:06, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Misplaced Pages:Suspected sock puppets/Chimpywiki for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page.Template:Do not delete haz (talk) 22:13, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Wymondham College. Poeloq (talk) 22:41, 25 January 2008 (UTC)


You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Misplaced Pages's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

-- Ed (Edgar181) 12:14, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Chimpywiki (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Having done nothing since my last warning, I fail to see why I am being blocked from editing. Are you just a really angry man?

Decline reason:

The sock puppetry seems clear. You also do not seem to have any intention of editing constructively. Kuru 14:56, 26 January 2008 (UTC)


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Chimpywiki (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

What sock puppetry?? I thought we had already been through this and explained that spongebobq is my friend who I go to school with? I had been given a final warning, and consequently had stopped making unconstructive edits, yet I was then told I was going to be blocked indefinitely anyway? Surely the fact that I stopped making phony edits is proof that I'm going to stop from now on?

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=What sock puppetry?? I thought we had already been through this and explained that spongebobq is my friend who I go to school with? I had been given a final warning, and consequently had stopped making unconstructive edits, yet I was then told I was going to be blocked indefinitely anyway? Surely the fact that I stopped making phony edits is proof that I'm going to stop from now on? |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=What sock puppetry?? I thought we had already been through this and explained that spongebobq is my friend who I go to school with? I had been given a final warning, and consequently had stopped making unconstructive edits, yet I was then told I was going to be blocked indefinitely anyway? Surely the fact that I stopped making phony edits is proof that I'm going to stop from now on? |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=What sock puppetry?? I thought we had already been through this and explained that spongebobq is my friend who I go to school with? I had been given a final warning, and consequently had stopped making unconstructive edits, yet I was then told I was going to be blocked indefinitely anyway? Surely the fact that I stopped making phony edits is proof that I'm going to stop from now on? |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
Categories: