Misplaced Pages

User talk:Arcayne

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Stifle (talk | contribs) at 17:35, 6 February 2008 (Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Heroes.S1.full.cast.jpg: reply). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 17:35, 6 February 2008 by Stifle (talk | contribs) (Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Heroes.S1.full.cast.jpg: reply)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
This user values third opinions and occasionally provides one.
Caveat
This user reserves the right to be more fun than you.
File:Skull logo.jpg CruftEater™ Local 665
Eating cruft since 2007



This user thinks huffing kittens.cannot end well




Howdy!
Click here to leave a new message.
Rude messages will be deleted at my whim.


Archive
♦My Spellbook♦
(Or, "How I Learned to Stop Hatin' & Love All the Crazy")
Arc 000
Arc 001
Arc 002
Arc 003
Arc 004

Arc 005
Arc 006
Arc 07
Archive 8
Archive 9
Archive 10
Archive 11
Archive 12
Archive 13
Archive 14
Archive 15
Archive 16
Archive 17
Archive 18
Archive 19
Archive 20
Archive 21
Archive 22
Archive 23
Archive 24
Interlude: Textboxes

What was archived

FYI

Please see this post. Thank you. 207.237.228.83 (talk) 01:06, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:Hiya

OK, thanks. Just curious! And btw, I think the Googoosh page is excellent. ЩіκіRocкs 04:05, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

You and your ego. I never said you made it excellent! Geeeeeeeez...lol...just joking. ЩіκіRocкs 04:26, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
OK this conversation is going on quite a bit, but I just wanted to say that it's nice to see some editors actually have a personality and sense of humour. I think some editors are actually robots!!!! :O ....and I'm not talking about the bots.... ЩіκіRocкs 04:40, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Films January 2008 Newsletter

The January 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have any suggestions for improvement or desire other topics to be covered, please leave a message on the talk page of one of the editors.Thank you. Nehrams2020 (talk) 01:08, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Sorry to ruin your day but....

DG is back...(as a number - no prizes for figuring out which) Colin4C (talk) 21:58, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Hi, not under this IP...but how many does he have? Jack1956 (talk) 20:48, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

IP user and Nancy Reagan

Hey I just wanted to thank you for defending me and the article with this posting on the IP's talk page. He is whacked! He's crazy! According to him, all edits must be discussed on the talk page and there are mutliple users (namely User:Wasted Time R, User:Tvoz, and especially myself) that are out to get him and have been bullying the NR article nonstop. He seems to be digging up supposed dirt on me and why the NR FAC was "problematic" and "unjust", and how multiple users have bullied him because we (namely me) own the article. It's insane. And I've ingored most of it. Unless I am attacked specifically in this upcoming medcab request (which is completely uncalled for), or the FA status of the article is placed in jeopardy, I'm going to ignore it. We (Wasted, Tvoz, me) told him that not all the content he wanted to add is suitable for an encyclopedia, and those that are not completely topic specific to NR should go in other articles. Well he didn't like that. He didn't get his way, so he's called a medcab, a Wikiquette on me, and contacted User:Raul654 to try to get him to intervene. You're right: he's acting like a fourth grader. --Happyme22 (talk) 02:35, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Please be reminded of this comment. 207.237.228.83 (talk) 03:29, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
Hap, you are welcome. Anon user, I don't need to be reminded of anything, as I am well aware of the situation. Consider that you might be better off seeking other people's input rahter than offering it yourself. Keep your ego in your pants. If you don't you might find something rather important excised. - Arcayne () 03:52, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Ronald Reagan is set to be featured on the main page in about five minutes. Just be alert when you log on, because there is going to be some heavy vandalism! I requested protection and it was denied because it's going to be featured, but here is only some of what happened when Nancy was TFA. As for Nancy's current situation, it appears the medcab mediator called it off - haha! Thanks again, Happyme22 (talk) 23:59, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Heroes.S1.full.cast.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Heroes.S1.full.cast.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. This is because it is an image depicting living people, which is easily replaceable. Please read the instructions at Misplaced Pages:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Misplaced Pages:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Misplaced Pages policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 15:42, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

With respect, is it your contention that the image is in fact readily replaceable? I ask, because I haven't seen a cast ensemble grouping image anywhere on the web. Perhaps I am in fact mistaken in my research, but I uploaded it with the conviction that an alternative image does not exist. - Arcayne () 17:20, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
No, it is my contention that there is a free equivalent that could be created. WP:NFCC #1 requires that no free equivalent is available or could be created, it says nothing of "readily replaceable". Apologies for the poor choice of words in my original message.
Just about any fair use image of any combination of living people is not permitted on Misplaced Pages. Stifle (talk) 17:35, 6 February 2008 (UTC)