This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Arcayne (talk | contribs) at 18:10, 6 February 2008 (→Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Heroes.S1.full.cast.jpg: rebutting the contention). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 18:10, 6 February 2008 by Arcayne (talk | contribs) (→Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Heroes.S1.full.cast.jpg: rebutting the contention)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff) | This user values third opinions and occasionally provides one. |
 | Caveat This user reserves the right to be more fun than you. |
| File:Skull logo.jpg | CruftEater™ Local 665 Eating cruft since 2007 |
 | This user thinks huffing kittens.cannot end well |
| Howdy! Click here to leave a new message. Rude messages will be deleted at my whim. |
|---|
What was archivedFYIPlease see this post. Thank you. 207.237.228.83 (talk) 01:06, 2 February 2008 (UTC) Re:HiyaOK, thanks. Just curious! And btw, I think the Googoosh page is excellent. ЩіκіRocкs 04:05, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
WikiProject Films January 2008 NewsletterThe January 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have any suggestions for improvement or desire other topics to be covered, please leave a message on the talk page of one of the editors.Thank you. Nehrams2020 (talk) 01:08, 3 February 2008 (UTC) Sorry to ruin your day but....DG is back...(as a number - no prizes for figuring out which) Colin4C (talk) 21:58, 3 February 2008 (UTC) Hi, not under this IP...but how many does he have? Jack1956 (talk) 20:48, 4 February 2008 (UTC) IP user and Nancy ReaganHey I just wanted to thank you for defending me and the article with this posting on the IP's talk page. He is whacked! He's crazy! According to him, all edits must be discussed on the talk page and there are mutliple users (namely User:Wasted Time R, User:Tvoz, and especially myself) that are out to get him and have been bullying the NR article nonstop. He seems to be digging up supposed dirt on me and why the NR FAC was "problematic" and "unjust", and how multiple users have bullied him because we (namely me) own the article. It's insane. And I've ingored most of it. Unless I am attacked specifically in this upcoming medcab request (which is completely uncalled for), or the FA status of the article is placed in jeopardy, I'm going to ignore it. We (Wasted, Tvoz, me) told him that not all the content he wanted to add is suitable for an encyclopedia, and those that are not completely topic specific to NR should go in other articles. Well he didn't like that. He didn't get his way, so he's called a medcab, a Wikiquette on me, and contacted User:Raul654 to try to get him to intervene. You're right: he's acting like a fourth grader. --Happyme22 (talk) 02:35, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
Ronald Reagan is set to be featured on the main page in about five minutes. Just be alert when you log on, because there is going to be some heavy vandalism! I requested protection and it was denied because it's going to be featured, but here is only some of what happened when Nancy was TFA. As for Nancy's current situation, it appears the medcab mediator called it off - haha! Thanks again, Happyme22 (talk) 23:59, 5 February 2008 (UTC) Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Heroes.S1.full.cast.jpgThanks for uploading Image:Heroes.S1.full.cast.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. This is because it is an image depicting living people, which is easily replaceable. Please read the instructions at Misplaced Pages:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Misplaced Pages:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Misplaced Pages policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page. If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 15:42, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
...the list goes on and on, but I think I've presented fairly conclusive evidence that "just about any fair use image of any combination of living people" is in fact permitted in Misplaced Pages, and in fact is utilized in many, many FA-quality articles. - Arcayne () 18:10, 6 February 2008 (UTC) |
||||||||
