This is an old revision of this page, as edited by OwenX (talk | contribs) at 02:25, 9 February 2008 (Reverted edits by 203.134.93.195 (talk) to last version by Zebra91). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 02:25, 9 February 2008 by OwenX (talk | contribs) (Reverted edits by 203.134.93.195 (talk) to last version by Zebra91)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)| This is Loopla's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
| Archives: 1, 2, 3 |
 Archives |
Subpages: User Page • Contributions • Talk • Barnstars
Signpost updated for December 26th, 2007.
 |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 52 | 26 December 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 13:31, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
St Joseph's College Hunter's Hill
Hey Loopla, I'm wondering if you can verify Image:JoeysHH1930s.jpg supposedly of St. Joseph's College, Hunters Hill. The building bears very little similarity to the main building of the school; the landscaping around the building in the photograph bears no similarity whatsoever to the relatively flat terrain immediately around the actual school. I think you've got the wrong St Joseph's. -Sticks66 (talk) 13:31, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
The photo in question is of Kincoppal-Rose Bay, School of the Sacred Heart, Sydney. Castlemate (talk) 02:39, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for January 2nd and 7th, 2008.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 1 | 2 January 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 2 | 7 January 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:55, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for January 14th, 2008.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 3 | 14 January 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:34, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for January 21st, 2008.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 4 | 21 January 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 00:04, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for January 28th, 2008.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 5 | 28 January 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 03:53, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
Prince Alfred College
I was wondering why you removed the line: "Professors who attended PAC include:"? Cheers, Pdfpdf (talk) 12:02, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
P.S. Have you got any ideas about the statement 'The Director of Rowing is colloquially known as "The Rangga"'? To me, it seems worthy of removal. What do you think? Pdfpdf (talk) 12:02, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
- I agree. Thanks. Pdfpdf (talk) 14:45, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
PLC Peer Review
Completed a PR of PLC Sydney, i think its good enough for FA. Good work. Twenty Years 07:38, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
User:Josh710
Hey I noticed you added a tag on Josh710 for poor edits, he's doing the same with the article for The Biggest Loser Australia (Season 3) and thought you might like to add to the dispute on the discussion page or help with stopping his edits as they are frustrating. He keeps reverting edits and removing information, adding his own information which is poorly written and messing up the consistency set out by the previous two seasons. I can't seem to explain clearly that the article is being messed up. Do you know the process to get it sorted out civilly? Cheers. Peter (talk) 03:09, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for February 4th, 2008.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 6 | 4 February 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:15, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
In response to the removal of the aforementioned section, i adress Loopla and Twenty Years. I my self am i past captain of the college and believe that both i, and my fellow captains deserve a mention on this site. i also believe that the current leadership have the right to be mentioned, as i would have appreciated also many years ago. What is the point of wikipedia? the answer is to provide information to the public, and to let the public decide what is included. i feel that these two categories fulfill both criteria. the information is rlevant, wheter you accept it or not.
In response to it being unencylopedic wordnet.princeton.edu/perl/webwn defines encyclopedic as being broad in scope or content. The history of college leadership isnt broad enough for you?
and finally, the audacity of saying that no one cares is shocking. evidently the poor soul who added the list cares, hence enough to warrent its presence. i feel that people should STOP trying to enforce their beleifs on this site. none of you, and i speak particularly to loopla and Twenty Years, are administrators on this site. you have the same entitlements as anyone else in this world does to decide what goes on this page. for this reason, i will continue to undo your edits. wikipedia is not about manipulation and controlling, thats not the reason why you are allowed to edit it. i hope to not have to continue in this childish war. if anyone wishes to discuss this issue further, please do so.