This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Charles Stewart (talk | contribs) at 16:21, 11 February 2008 (i read it and can remove it per WP:TALK or WP:USER). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 16:21, 11 February 2008 by Charles Stewart (talk | contribs) (i read it and can remove it per WP:TALK or WP:USER)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)You've reached the talk page of Charles Stewart, please leave your message at the beep:
Welcome! Hello there
Hello, Charles Stewart, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}}
before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!
TheA Daily Show
What do the credits say Gnevin (talk) 16:46, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
- I don't know, but they would probably name the writers. Eitherway, the sentence I removed made zero sense. Charles Stewart (talk) 16:51, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
- It makes prefect sense as it's unclear who is writing this show , please continue this on the article talk page Gnevin (talk) 16:59, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
- Its safe to say that Stewart his writing his own stuff , . Charles Stewart (talk) 17:04, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
- Still not clear but better Gnevin (talk) 17:13, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
- Its safe to say that Stewart his writing his own stuff , . Charles Stewart (talk) 17:04, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
- It makes prefect sense as it's unclear who is writing this show , please continue this on the article talk page Gnevin (talk) 16:59, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
Blocked
You've been blocked for two days for your page move stunt. --Bongwarrior (talk) 12:14, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).Charles Stewart (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Its been nine hours, and I feel I've learned my lesson. I just want to do good for this site.
Decline reason:
That's unconvincing. Learned how? What does "do good" mean? Persuade us by not disrupting this site after the block expires. — Sandstein (talk) 21:21, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Ok Charles Stewart (talk) 21:23, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).Charles Stewart (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
shaving a few hours off my block won't hurt anyone. I'm sorry for what I did, and I promise not to do it again, and only to help this fine project
Decline reason:
There's absolutely no assurance of that. Be glad you weren't blocked indefinitely. ~ Riana ⁂ 02:58, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Notability of Ameripedia
A tag has been placed on Ameripedia requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.
If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}}
to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Misplaced Pages guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Blanchardb--timed 22:42, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
Move
Please try not to move this page (your talk page) about when you move your user page (which you shouldn't really do in the first place).—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 09:38, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
- Sorry about that. Charles Stewart (talk) 09:40, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
User:Judicator700
Why on Earth did you add that tag to the userpage? If you have a problem with an editor's contributions, discuss it with them, don't just add some random tag to their userpage. That is not the way we work. J Milburn (talk) 22:14, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
- Further aggression. Please calm yourself, or you are going to end up blocked again. J Milburn (talk) 11:09, 11 February 2008 (UTC)