This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Ruhrfisch (talk | contribs) at 20:56, 17 October 2006 (→[]: semi automated peer review). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 20:56, 17 October 2006 by Ruhrfisch (talk | contribs) (→[]: semi automated peer review)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Barbara Hambly
Rather than allow more edit warring, AND as I'm still learning, I'm asking for feedback and help in the recent edits. I understand I may be in error on my efforts, but I think I've made factual and proper good faith edits. I seem to have a problem with this user (WLU) owning every page she edits. Which may well be fine, but in asking several people on the IRC channel as well as a few Admin’s I was referred to this format to best deal with a "page owner". I'm seeking input that will help me be a better editor and to better understand the proper protocols and policies. Thanx --Mystar 04:26, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
Mystar has made incorrect edits, which I have corrected and provided justification for in the talk pages. I have pointed out where Mystar was incorrect and provided references and quotations to back up my edits. Mystar does not seem to read the actual links, which is why I have moved from just the link, to the actual quotations I am using to support my changes. I do not own the pages I edit, many people have edited pages I have altered as well. WLU 13:10, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
From the instructions (above): "Requests for expansion or Cleanup, and content or neutrality disputes should be listed at Requests for comment." Sandy 00:06, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
- Please see automated peer review suggestions here. Thanks, Ruhrfisch 20:56, 17 October 2006 (UTC)