This is an old revision of this page, as edited by SineBot (talk | contribs) at 05:45, 18 February 2008 (Signing comment by Johnshoemaker - ""). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 05:45, 18 February 2008 by SineBot (talk | contribs) (Signing comment by Johnshoemaker - "")(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
 Archives |
To Dchall
Your edits are very clearly biased and serves certain interests, especially the brutal regime ruling Iran.
→Your edits are very clearly biased and serves certain interests, especially the brutal regime ruling Iran. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by AlborzTaha (talk • contribs) 06:16, 17 July 2007 (UTC).
Answer from Alborz Taha
Dchall1, You wrote that you have no favoritism towards either the PMOI or the Iranian state. But I really wonder why your edits exactly accord with the same allegations made by the Iranian regime. Let’s say you added “Increasing numbers of MKO members are starting to return to Iran and are claiming asylum” which is neither true nor “based on reliable sources”! You even use the term”MKO” for the PMOI which is merely used by that regime and its affiliated media. I would be very happy to know where you are receiving such information. I suggest you to be impartial and let the Misplaced Pages be clean of Iranian regime’s misinformation. AlborzTaha,
STOP MISINFORMATION
I advise you to read what you refer to at least ONCE!. The article " Group on U.S. terror list lobbies hard" never says anywhere that “Increasing numbers of MKO members are starting to return to Iran and are claiming asylum”. By the way the article is dated May 31, 2005 which obviously can not support any existing claim today. This is a blatant misinformation which violates the Misplaced Pages 'neutral point of view' standards and pillars. I will follow this and submit a complain against such misinformation to Misplaced Pages management. .AlborzTaha.
Do not delete facts.
To: DChall1
I noticed that you omitted the NCRI platform that I had added to the NCRI page. Do you have any reason to justify it. Because this is the publicly announced platform of the NCRI since 25 years ago and it is no POV. 193.219.246.250
- I understand that this is a publicly announced platform, but you copied it from the NCRI website, which is a violation of Misplaced Pages's copyright policies. If you would like to reword and summarize the information (briefly), feel free to do so. Otherwise, material copied from outside websites will be promptly deleted. Dchall1 15:34, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
- can't you just quote it? Jaguar Verde (talk) 06:10, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
Why so hysteric against PMOI?
Could you justify your hostility against the PMOI? This is not your first time. You have a background of misinformation in this regard too. Everybody in the world knows that PMOI revealed Iranian regime's clandestine nuclear project which was definitely based on the information PMOI had received from its forces inside Iran. Yet, you insist on deleting the activities of this organization inside Iran!! There could be only one justification for denouncing an opposition organization: deeply supporting the religious fascist mullahs in Iran, whatever the reason might be!! You may continue distorting the realities about the just resistance of Iran. But nothing and nobody can prevent the fate of a collapsing regime. Well, still claiming of no favoritism toward mullahs??!!AlborzTaha 18:46, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
- I'm sorry if you disagree with my edits. However, your changes violate wikipedia's policies on neutral point of view. If you still feel you that my edits are unfair, please feel free to complain about me to an administrator or to WP:AIV. Dchall1 19:53, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
You are wrong
I quoted the sources, there are not my personal point of views. Did you read the sources? Adrianzax (talk) 17:06, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
== Reply == ok. sorry if it sounded subjective... my only purpuse is to unveil the truth, and the truth is that dom and rom are the same people. anyway I won't modify the dom page anymore. I will write this in Romani people page and write in a more neutral manner. Salutes ! Adrianzax (talk) 17:16, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
- You're mistaken, I'm not the one who's reverting. Misplaced Pages's main motto is to sustain a neutral policy, I posted 3 reliable sources from 3 very popular websites. Misplaced Pages isn't a personal toy that can be used only be 3 subjective persons. Adrianzax (talk) 02:39, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
3RR, or...?
Hi, Dchall1! I am one of the part-time editors of the Romani people page. I replied to one of Adrianzax's posts on the discussion page of that article.
You warned him that he may be reported for 3RR. I am not sure whether or not that is the correct designation. If he also engages, or has engaged, in vandalism, then it seems we cannot report him for 3RR. Is that correct?
Anyway, I just thought I'd ask, in case this would avoid complications. --Kuaichik (talk) 03:58, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
- Well, I didn't mean to say they were mutually exclusive, either. It's just that on the page for reporting 3RR, they say something about how you shouldn't use that page to report 3RR if the user is otherwise problematic, or something. --Kuaichik (talk) 04:10, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
- Well, I dunno...anyhow, thank you and good night! (I should probably be going to bed, too...:-P) --Kuaichik (talk) 04:21, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
I count four reverts for you on this article. I have therefore blocked you along with Adrianzax for 24 hours. Please pursue ] in the future rather than repeatedly reverting. If you wish to contest the block, you may add {{unblock|reason}} to your talk page. Heimstern Läufer (talk) 22:49, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
i don't appreciate your action
on the osama bin laden talk page you deleted all of my comments indiscriminately, and further made the accusation that my comments were "Rv and borderline trolling." one of them was to point out a typo - but you deleted that one.
Please go back and undo your revert, in the case of the pointed out typo, at least. Also, it is just your own opinion that my comments were not for improving the article (in most cases). And why didn't you delete the comments that I was responding to, that are worse than mine? Do you just not like me, or what, because I don't see any other reason why you would delete mine and not others? like "michael's" who said "f you leroy osama is satan in the flesh"? please explain yourself, and again, please un-revert the typo quote, at the very least. That is representative of my intent, as it was my very first comment. And I would like it if you left the one about the History Channel's actions as well, since that is very encyclopedic as well. If you don't undo your last edit and leave, at the very least, the typo quote, I will report you. Jaguar Verde (talk) 06:18, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
Same here; You seem to think the following is POV.
"Their handiwork has given rise to an explosion of defense spending and many an actual war. Both factors contribute to the rise of the industrialized countries and the further disenfranchise of the third world. The occasional success of Lebanon has thus led to a structural polarization in what was supposed to become a global village after the fall of the Berlin Wall. It is believed that once in the after life, the martyr receives one thousand virgins of his liking.The whole world now suffers under these misguided believers ( some of them children under the overpowering influence of older men: a form of pedophilia ) who actively seek death to declare their Faith, instead of encountering death as an unwilled side effect ("incidental cost") of their verbal declarations of their belief and refusals to recant. This is the case of the Christian martyr. The Roman Catholic Church beatifies martyrs, but holds no beliefs as to how their live in the wold to come is, or will be. Other Christian denominations also hold such martyrs in high regard. Amongst the modern ones are those who opposed Nazism in Germany and occupied countries. However, all those who used violence in doing so are never considered martyrs. Christianity has always chosen life over death, as witness its stance against abortion and what is so wrongfully called 'euthanasia' nowadays. Thus, the Muslem shaheed must never be confused with the Christian martyr."
And your editing is not POV? You clearly know very little of Christianity or modern history. Have you ever seen the film of the poor little boy that stood for hours at an IDF checkpoint? What would you call that? Please answer me and all of us!
I don't mind edits, but be more specific next time, will you please?
VNCCC (talk) 17:49, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
WikiProject Germany Invitation
|
--Zeitgespenst (talk) 19:32, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
Ratko Mladic
what the hell? the ratko mladic thing is a FACT why are you removing it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.88.51.210 (talk) 20:29, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
yes i have a news source. http://www.eubusiness.com/news-eu/1200538922.55/
thank you a lot for embarrasing me when i was right —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.88.51.210 (talk) 16:38, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
Jan 2008
I am aware of NPOV. My edits were as such.Hxseek (talk) 06:48, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
- OK. We can remove "col-blooded" and retain the rest of the facts —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hxseek (talk • contribs) 07:00, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
Well, yHupchick is a Professor in Balkanology from US. Maybe u should look him up. Any way , i'd behappy to rework some of the content. I understand its a contentious isssue, but what i have writtedn certainly is not fabricated Hxseek (talk) 07:12, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
My Rfa
Well, not this time anyway it seems...my effort to regain my adminship was unsuccessful, but your support was still very much appreciated. Let me know if there is anything I can do for you. Thank you!--MONGO 07:20, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
Kosovo paragraph
The paragraph isn't controversial at all and there are sources over at the Demographic history of Kosovo article, but is totally unnecessary for the main article. --PaxEquilibrium (talk) 19:53, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
Invitation
Please remove your deletion template from AIDS (computer virus)
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article AIDS (computer virus), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Misplaced Pages is not" and Misplaced Pages's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of AIDS (computer virus). Dchall1 (talk) 17:00, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
- Per the AIDS and AIDS II articles, the AIDS family was the first known family of viruses to use the corresponding file technique to propagate infection. This is worthy of notice. Please remove your deletion template. A-Day (t) 06:56, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
Holy Ayaan
Hi there. Thanks for the note. Yes, this article was created by a banned editor and has now been deleted as well as the various accounts having been blocked. Thank you for infoming me - Alison 07:28, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks for pointing out the article to an admin. I had reported the user last week for biased edits to Ayaan's main article (see:) and you should have seen the talk page before it was cleared of the conversations he/she had led. POV to the tenth power. Take care.--AgnosticPreachersKid (talk) 09:04, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Arbonne International
An article that you have been involved in editing, Arbonne International, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Arbonne International. Thank you.
I've re-listed the AfD you started, as you hadn't placed the AfD notice on the article page. Argyriou (talk) 06:30, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
Please do not delete Ramashreya Jha
He is a very famous composer of Hindustani vocal classical music and deserves a wiki page for students of Hindustani classical music. I am working on this article and will continue to improve it over the next few days. Anupa4 (talk) 06:07, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
Napoleon Noir
I declined the speedy deletion of this article -- it is definitely not patent nonsense, as the text, although misguided and confused, is definitely comprehensible. If you'd like, go ahead and bring it to Afd. - Revolving Bugbear 23:04, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
inuse tag
Hi, Please try to avoid editing articles that has this tag. I was editing and updating a newly created article (Alexis Biesiada) when apparently you removed my inuse tag and edited the article. Ignoring this tag can create lots of lost work and edit conflicts so please in the future refrain from editing articles with this tag. Thanks. --Ubardak (talk) 06:32, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
guidelines for the naming of articles
Like too many other editors who have contributed to the current renaming debate at 9/11 conspiracy theories, you claimed that what "reliable sources" call something is a consideration in choosing names for articles, despite the fact that it had already been pointed out that this was not the case. Please do not misrepresent wikipedia policy and guidelines in this way because it causes a lot of confusion. ireneshusband (talk) 09:56, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi Chris, I agree with your edits. Косовска Митровица (talk) 18:57, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
Why i don't like you
You took off my page about djanssen25.com I own the website and i should be able to write about it people need to know about it i get many views so stop closing page for no reason you should be striped of you administrative abilities. —Preceding unsigned comment added by ILoveDcast (talk • contribs) 17:47, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
Non-mystical Kaballah
Please let me know why you deleted this page. Are you contending there is no such thing as Non-mystical K------? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Johnshoemaker (talk • contribs) 04:43, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
Dear Chris, thanks for replying on my talk page. You wrote:
:I'll be honest, I tag a lot of articles for deletion and I don't remember this one in particular. I think I ran a google search and couldn't find any reliable sources on the topic.
Carlo Suarez in the author of Cabalah Trilogy and Cypher of Genesis and the only writer who writes of a non-mystical cabala. In his writing he simply writes that cabala wasn't originally mystical. He nor his school harped on the term NMK. I did to differentiate it from the "Traditional" Kabbalah. Mystical = "above the intellect." Suarez gives definitions for the Hieroglyphs in which Torah is embodied(Hebrew alphabet actually Spiritual Glyphs) and encourages us cabalists to think about them. Ask for one of the definitions. The WP Kabbalah article states that it is a "mystical" tradition. Did anyone influence you to delete this use of the term cabala that is not above the intellect? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Johnshoemaker (talk • contribs) 05:44, 18 February 2008 (UTC)