Misplaced Pages

:Good article reassessment/Hulk (comics)/1 - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Good article reassessment

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Majoreditor (talk | contribs) at 04:59, 1 March 2008 (Hulk (comics): typo). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 04:59, 1 March 2008 by Majoreditor (talk | contribs) (Hulk (comics): typo)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Hulk (comics)

Article (edit | visual edit | history· Article talk (edit | history· WatchWatch article reassessment page
Result pending

This article has undergone some problems. It was listed, apparently wrongly, and the primary author delisted it. However, another editor disagreed that the article had been delisted, causing some problems. I nominate it now to get a clear consensus from other editors, thus avoiding any confusion/unnecessary revertion. Thanks, PeterSymonds | talk 20:55, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

No review is needed. An admin feels that the article was improperly passed and listed. As such, it has been delisted. This is an open and shut case. Do not waste reviewer time with this case.ThuranX (talk) 21:17, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

Comment Primary author of this article, ThuranX, should refrain from listing/delisting this article due to WP:COI. OhanaUnited 01:52, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

  • Question and comment. Does anyone contest the de-listing? If so, please step forward and tell us why you think the article should still be listed as GA-class. Majoreditor (talk) 03:35, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Comment. I can't comment on whether or not the article actually qualifies as a GA-class article (whether it does now or ever did, I don't know), but I will say that the de-listing seems to have been done in bad faith because ThuranX is angry at an administrator, DavidFuchs, who does not believe it should be rated GA and has rewritten large sections of the article since the GA-class was awarded. All of this, plus recent chatter on the article's talk page, should be kept in mind. BOZ (talk) 04:03, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
Category: