Misplaced Pages

:Featured article review/Angkor Wat/archive1 - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Featured article review | Angkor Wat

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by AnmaFinotera (talk | contribs) at 02:33, 4 April 2008 (FAR for Angkor Wat). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 02:33, 4 April 2008 by AnmaFinotera (talk | contribs) (FAR for Angkor Wat)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Angkor Wat

I am nominating this article for review as I feel it no longer meets the FA criteria. Most concerning is its failure of 1c and 2c with whole paragraphs being appearing to be completely unsourced and confusing mix of referencing styles used. I also feel it fails criteria 3 with an excessive amount of images that flow all the way down the external link sections. Most are unnecessary and do not illustrate the sections they are in and appear to have been added for decoration. It also fails criteria 2a and WP:LEAD in that it does not adequately summarize the entire article. Collectonian (talk) 02:33, 4 April 2008 (UTC)