This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Sniperfox (talk | contribs) at 20:33, 8 April 2008 (Forgot to sign). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 20:33, 8 April 2008 by Sniperfox (talk | contribs) (Forgot to sign)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)this is my talk page. if you want to talk about me, this is the place to do it.
In my opinion, this posting (copied below) by you proves that you're against points of view other than your own, which is contrary to what wikipedia stands for. Just because you don't view something as a controversy does not mean it's not controversial. Please re-read wikipedia's neutral point of view documentation regarding balance here.
- Given their long history, there is no way a single ad campaign (or a single ad in it) gone unnoticed by all but a small contingent of white supremacists and other miscellaneous right wingers looking for their "controversy" du jour could rise to the level of notability that would merit its inclusion in the page. Given that absolut-ly no one cares outside of the Malkin set, a rather fringe political demographic to be sure, I'd have to second the motion to protect the page until the "issue" is forgotten (i.e. next week). The rabbit in the suitcase (talk) 02:25, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
While you are certainly free to have an opinion, you are not free to suppress other's opinions here on wikipedia. With as much hate as you seem to have in your heart for differing viewpoints, I don't expect you to learn to accept other's views, but please at least learn to tolerate the existance of other points of view.
It's the only way to achieve balance. Sniper Fox (talk) 20:33, 8 April 2008 (UTC)