Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Jc37 (talk | contribs) at 06:04, 14 April 2008 (response). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

This page was nominated for deletion on 2007-08-26. The result of the discussion was keep.

However, the mediation cabal is not on the list. Wow, that quiet eh? Kim Bruning 10:06, 15 May 2006 (UTC)

Hello, welcome Kim Bruning! Misplaced Pages is a wiki; that means individuals (even you!) can edit pages to correct mistakes and add information. If you see a page that needs information added, please click "edit this page" and add it! Welcome to Misplaced Pages, where it's a wiki wiki world!

/evil smile/ Essjay (Talk • Connect) 02:51, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

Why am I not surprised to learn that you two have edited this page. n.n <3 ~Kylu (u|t) 06:50, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

white-collar American cabal - this one does actually exist - what's it doing in a page under a humour (sorry, that should be "humor") banner? MarkThomas 11:25, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

The "IRC Cabal" needs to be added sometime. Gurch should do it, since he's leader of the cabal and all. ~Kylu (u|t) 05:24, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

Ssshh... TINC! TINC! – Gurch 05:35, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

"Of course, cabals that actually exist are by default excluded from this page. You did not just read that." --Raijinili 18:07, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

FNORD! FNORD! FNORD! Essjay (Talk) 04:19, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

The emerging penguin cabal should be listed here.--24.20.69.240 09:18, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

Never mind, its already there. Should have seen it before posting. 24.20.69.240 20:53, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

Enough with this list of conspiracy theories! The plain truth is that there is now only a Cabal of One, and you will know them by the rings that they wear, as it is written:

       One for the Dark TINC on his dark throne
       In the Land of Wiki where the Cabals lie.
       One Ring to rule them all, One Ring to find them,
       One Ring to bring them all and in the darkness bind them
       In the Land of Wiki where the Cabals lie.

67.176.29.209 05:02, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

/le gasp/ You're not supposed to know about the cabal! How'd you find out? /looks around suspiciously/

Real commentary Cute, real cute. :) I like it. On Uncyclopedia they have a whole list of pages about the non-existance of the cabal. I'll include it in a second.--Song 03:25, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

Removal

This page is used to make fun of people who question certain things and to belittle them. Making fun of people should not be concidered humorous and thats why this page should be deleted. Besides that it can be uased as a 'weapon' to silence people who are serious about this. 87.210.105.64 13:54, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

It's just humour. It's not teasing anyone. There are plnty of Humourouse pages on wikipedia see the Misplaced Pages:Department of Fun. I'll rmv the Npov but you can put it back on if you have a problem with this--Pheonix15 (talk) 17:33, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

New picture for page - how to integrate?

I'd like to see this on the cabal page but I'm unsure of how to integrate it cleanly. Anyone have any ideas? Triddle 15:32, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

WP:LOC shortcut

Since this article is for humor, I think the WP:LOC shortcut should instead be directed to the League of Copyeditors. Their focus is improving articles and I think they could get better use out of it. Thoughts? KnightLago 16:09, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

Delete a "cabal"

I've removed the Boy Scout cabal, as I feel it was made solely as a vindictive listing bu User:Allstarecho against me because I nominated two of his templates for deletion, one of which was and the other was not. Humor certainly has its place, but I find nothing funny about this content as it is directly solely at my actions. Please discuss here before reverting. Justinm1978 (talk) 03:54, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

Bitter much? I find you removing the content solely vindictive because of your harassment of me over the 2 templates you mentioned. Stalking has NO place. And how dare you tell people to discuss it here before reverting... did you discuss it here before removing the content in the first place? NO, you did not. - ✰ALLSTAR✰ 14:40, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

Explain and clarify how I am stalking by removing an edit that is directly related to my actions? How is it vindictive to remove something that was placed and referenced by my edits and actions? How is singling out the actions of a single user and calling it a cabal constructive? It's not funny, and if anybody needs to do some growing up here, it would be the editor who would rather push for this cruft than edit articles. Justinm1978 (talk) 16:21, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

And yet you are here arguing over a humor page instead of following your own advice. Read the freaking huge purple box and get over yourself. The world doesn't revolve around you and your paranoia is childish. - ✰ALLSTAR✰ 18:37, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

List of...

Regardless of whether people like these or not, if there is no supporting page on Misplaced Pages introducing/describing the group and so forth, then it shouldn't be listed here.

If anything it will cut down on page length. - jc37 04:01, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

The original idea for the list was to highlight the absurdity of all the accusations that Misplaced Pages is controlled by the so-and-so cabal. For example, we are supposedly run by both pro- and anti-Communist cabals. Given that purpose, I would agree that all listings should reference the place where the cabal was alleged to exist. --bainer (talk) 23:24, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

Well, some sense of purpose to the page rather than the current directionless hodge-podge would be a plus : ) - jc37 06:04, 14 April 2008 (UTC)