This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Majoreditor (talk | contribs) at 00:17, 23 April 2008 (→Matsuo Bashō: Delist). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 00:17, 23 April 2008 by Majoreditor (talk | contribs) (→Matsuo Bashō: Delist)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Matsuo Bashō
- Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch article reassessment page
- Result pending I am asking for a reassessment/delisting as it fails section two of the good article criteria, "It is factually accurate and verifiable." More accurately, it fails 2b, "at minimum, provides in-line citations from reliable sources for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons". With virtually no inline citations I don't see this as a GA. Wizardman 13:22, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
- Every statement in this article is verifiable by checking the References section. Inline citations are not and have never been necessary on Misplaced Pages. Shii (tock) 04:44, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
- Delist. While Wikepedia doesn't require in-line citations for articles, it does requires them for GA listing. Please examine Good Article criteria, specifically 2-b. It states that a Good Article "provides in-line citations from reliable sources for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons". Majoreditor (talk) 00:17, 23 April 2008 (UTC)