Misplaced Pages

:Suspected sock puppets/SirIsaacBrock (3rd) - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Suspected sock puppets

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Darkspots (talk | contribs) at 22:36, 30 April 2008 (adding categories of articles edited by the two users). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 22:36, 30 April 2008 by Darkspots (talk | contribs) (adding categories of articles edited by the two users)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

User:SirIsaacBrock

Suspected sockpuppeteer

SirIsaacBrock (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)

Suspected sockpuppets

Chessy999 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)


Report submission by

Darkspots (talk) 19:01, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

Evidence

Chessy999 has edited Monkey-baiting to defend the article in the form written by SirFozzieBrock:

Both users have edited the following (partial) list of articles:

They have both moved Bait (dogs), from some other article name to that article name. Chessy999: SirIsaacBrock:

Chessy999, SirIsaacBrock, and User:WritersCramp (a confirmed sock of SirIsaacBrock) have all edited Nazi architecture.

Chessy999 and SirIsaacBrock have both edited articles about accounting, infantry weapons, War of 1812 battles, fighting dogs (obviously), chess and specifically chess pieces (many for Chessy, for SirIsaacBrook), Nazism, and Canadian military history. The majority of the edits of each user fall into one of these categories of articles.

This is all too close for coincidence. SirIsaacBrock is banned by the community for disruptive behavior and rampant sockpuppetry (Misplaced Pages:List of banned users#SirIsaacBrock). Chessy999 has a lot of civility/tendentious editing complaints on his user talk page. This user should be indef blocked as the sockpuppet of a banned user.

Comments


Conclusions