Misplaced Pages

:Suspected sock puppets/Indecisean - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Suspected sock puppets

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Neon white (talk | contribs) at 02:54, 6 May 2008 (User:Indecisean). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 02:54, 6 May 2008 by Neon white (talk | contribs) (User:Indecisean)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

User:Indecisean

Suspected sockpuppeteer

Indecisean (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)

Suspected sockpuppets

98.212.132.208 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
71.203.182.13 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
70.11.86.135 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
99.206.190.44 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
68.243.130.194 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)


Report submission by

--neonwhite user page talk 02:43, 6 May 2008 (UTC)


Evidence

History of this article The same edits, same content removal

similar bad faith accusations in the edit summaries

again same bad faith accusations

Comments

I suspect these are all the same person or are meatpuppets.

This person is not a "sockpuppet", there are merely a lot of people who are tired of Neon's heavy handed approach to several wiki pages along with his bad faith assumptions and threats. See his own page for more on this. Any staff checking the IPs or any other hard evidence will see this.(98.212.132.208 (talk) 02:51, 6 May 2008 (UTC))

I have made no such threats or assumptions of bad faith. Above user has been warned about not assuming good faith and vandalising the article. --neonwhite user page talk 02:53, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
Conclusions