Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Coppertwig (talk | contribs) at 02:37, 4 September 2008 (→3RR: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Robert schweppes

Welcome to Misplaced Pages! We welcome your help to create new content, but your recent additions (such as Robert schweppes) are considered nonsense. Please refrain from creating nonsense articles. If you want to test things out, edit the sandbox instead. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. andy 18:00, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices, as you did with Robert schweppes. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion. Thank you. andy 23:39, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages is an encyclopedia and not a newsticker

Hello,

I noted that you made several dozens of edits to Ligat ha'Al 2008-09 without no real change. Note that Misplaced Pages is an encyclopedia and not a newsticker, so such information is deemed unacceptable. Further, please use the "Show preview" button to preview your changes. This prevents the database from flooding with several edits for one article per minute. Regards, Hockey-holic (talk) 16:45, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Misplaced Pages pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 17:10, 3 September 2008 (UTC)

Caution to work collaboratively on Israeli-Palestinian related articles

Error: The code letters for the affected topic area in this contentious topics alert are not declared. topic= is missing; please check the documentation and try again.

Greetings. I'm placing this here based on your recent edits on the PNA article. This is a collaborative project; please don't try to impose your will/view on others. Do not make repeated reverts/edits of the same text, esp if more than one person is arguing against it; instead, proceed by reasoned conversation on the Talk page. Thanks foryour consideration. Best wishes, HG | Talk 22:29, 3 September 2008 (UTC)

3RR

Your recent editing history at Palestinian National Authority shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Coppertwig (talk) 02:37, 4 September 2008 (UTC)