This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Caspian blue (talk | contribs) at 14:53, 1 October 2008 (finishing my sentence). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 14:53, 1 October 2008 by Caspian blue (talk | contribs) (finishing my sentence)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff):Re
Read my edit summary again. I clearly said your edit looks "award" and suggested you to "revise yours", not stated your edit "false" or "lies" or whatever. That euphemistically says that the content is written in poor English. Some scholar, who is a Korean scholar.... I've never seen such weird opening along with others. --Caspian blue (talk) 10:50, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
- What is "award"?--Michael Friedrich (talk) 14:25, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
- What is the award? It may be your contentment for providing accurate information in clear English.--Caspian blue (talk) 14:31, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
- What do you mean? You said above that my edit looked "award." I asked you what you meant by that.--Michael Friedrich (talk) 14:34, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
- I already implied that the addition by you is "grammatically awkward". You're Japanese-Australian, so you can do better than that.--Caspian blue (talk) 14:50, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
- Oh, I see. horrible typo. not award--> awkward.--Caspian blue (talk) 14:53, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
- I already implied that the addition by you is "grammatically awkward". You're Japanese-Australian, so you can do better than that.--Caspian blue (talk) 14:50, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
- What do you mean? You said above that my edit looked "award." I asked you what you meant by that.--Michael Friedrich (talk) 14:34, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
- What is the award? It may be your contentment for providing accurate information in clear English.--Caspian blue (talk) 14:31, 1 October 2008 (UTC)