This is an old revision of this page, as edited by PhilKnight (talk | contribs) at 02:20, 8 November 2008 (→Question from PhilKnight). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 02:20, 8 November 2008 by PhilKnight (talk | contribs) (→Question from PhilKnight)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)This page is for General Questions to be asked of all candidates in the December 2008 Arbitration Committee Elections. Questions will be accepted until 00:00 UTC on 17 November 2008, at which time they will be posted to individual question pages for each candidate.
Please review and follow the instructions at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2008/Candidate statements/Questions/General before adding a question. If your question is similar to another question already posted, please consider combining the two (after consulting the other editor, of course).
General Questions
Question from Ultraexactzz
Good luck with your candidacy. UltraExactZZ ~ Evidence 15:59, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
- If you had to describe the ideal role of an Arbitrator in one word, what would that word be?
- ...
Questions from Giggy
- a/s/l?
- What is your opinion on the apparent divide in editors who focus primarily in mainspace, and those who focus primarily in project space? What would you do to help ease conflicts that come as a result of clashes between these editors? This is a deliberately open ended question.
- What is your opinion on the mass reversion of useful mainspace edits made by banned users?
- Pick one arbitration case opened in the last year that contains a final decision with which you disagree. How do you think the case should have been handled, what different proposals would you have made, etc.? Again, somewhat open ended.
- Please select and describe what you consider to be your five "best" contributions to Misplaced Pages.
- Will you be voting in this year's arbcom elections? Why/why not?
Thank you and good luck. Giggy (talk) 02:45, 6 November 2008 (UTC) Questions added via the global question list.
Questions from Sarcasticidealist
I'm repeating a couple of questions I asked on User:MBisanz's excellent voter guides; those of you who answered there can feel free to copy and paste your answers from there.
- To what extent do you believe that Misplaced Pages policy is or should be binding and prescriptive?
- What is your view of the presence of former Arbitrators on the main Arb Comm mailing list?
- At least one candidate has committed to being "open to recall" in much the same way as administrators in Category:Administrators open to recall. What is your view of the wisdom of this, and do you see yourself making a comparable commitment?
I echo both the thanks and the best wishes of the above questioners.
Questions from Celarnor
- What limits, if any, do you perceive in the ability of the Committee to write remedies with effects beyond those involved in a given case (.e,g, types other than those outlined in Arbitration policy, having an effect beyond "User X is subject to penalty/restriction Y")?
- What, if any, non-written obligations do you believe a member of the Committee has outside of their immediate duties on the committee?
Question from LessHeard vanU
This follows from the various attempts this year at addressing the means by which Administrators can be desysopped, none of which has gained sufficient traction.
- Given that the ArbCom already has the powers to investigate the conduct of Administrators, and to decide to withdraw access to the sysop flags, will you be willing to more readily accept Requests for Arbitration in respect of concerns raised generally on an administrators use of their tools than that has apparently been the case previously. Would you indeed promote the more frequent acceptance of such cases. If not, why not? LessHeard vanU (talk) 21:47, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for considering the above, and all the best in your endeavour.
Question from Carnildo
- How many hours a week do you expect to spend on arbitration-related activities?
Question from WilyD
- During the Sarah Palin protection wheel war, a very contentious point was whether it was appropriate for admins to take actions against other admins for misuse of their admin tools (or possibly just generally). While the block I issued in that case became moot when MBisanz filed for arbitration, similar situations are bound to crop up. So I ask two related points:
- Is it appropriate for an admin to block another admin over a regular editing issue? Are there any special considerations? If it is not appropriate, what kind of sanctions would you issue as an arbitrator?
- Is it appropriate for an admin to block another admin over misuse of their administrative tools? If so, when? If not, what kind of sanctions would you issue as an arbitrator?
Question from PhilKnight
- In what situations would you recuse yourself? Obviously, I'm not asking for a generic answer, but instead I'm genuinely interested in what subject areas, or conflicts involving which users, you would recuse yourself. PhilKnight (talk) 02:20, 8 November 2008 (UTC)