Misplaced Pages

:Suspected sock puppets/Highfructosecornsyrup - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Suspected sock puppets

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Cirt (talk | contribs) at 04:34, 2 December 2008 (User:Highfructosecornsyrup: c). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 04:34, 2 December 2008 by Cirt (talk | contribs) (User:Highfructosecornsyrup: c)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

User:Highfructosecornsyrup

Suspected sock puppeteer

Highfructosecornsyrup (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · tag · block user · block log · CheckUser)

Suspected sock puppets

See also accounts from the checkuser case cited below:

Report submission by
Evidence
Comments
Whoa, hey, Cirt? Highfructosecornsyrup turned out to be a sock of Wikipediatrix, who was duly chastised for it and had the sock indef-blocked. She apparently liked arguing with herself. But I seriously doubt she'd do it again. --GoodDamon 23:43, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

I did edit in Dianetics recently. And got attacked for adding a reliable source by an editor who seems to fulfill the WP:SPA description (99% scientology edits). A little research and I ended up on the Shutterbug/ArbCom page. Cirt's reaction confirms what I said there. Shrampes (talk) 23:54, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

Note the edits to the article "High-fructose corn syrup", combined with the same POV and Scientology-focus as Highfructosecornsyrup (talk · contribs). Cirt (talk) 04:34, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
Conclusions