This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Tommstein (talk | contribs) at 06:21, 17 October 2005 (→To Konrad West: Comment Deleted by DannyMuse: beats me). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 06:21, 17 October 2005 by Tommstein (talk | contribs) (→To Konrad West: Comment Deleted by DannyMuse: beats me)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Welcome!
Welcome Tommstien! --K. AKA Konrad West TALK 04:11, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
- Hey, it's Tommstein. Get it right. I kid, I kid. Thanks for the welcome. I'm currently finishing an explanation for why I'm about to reinsert a paragraph in an article, and then I have to join that WikiProject thing.Tommstein 05:09, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
- Oops. The result of trying to do too many things at the same time. ;) --K. AKA Konrad West TALK 05:47, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
To Konrad West: Comment Deleted by DannyMuse
I had responded to you on DannyMuse's Talk page, but, being a Jehovah's Witness that refuses to hear any inconvenient facts he doesn't want to hear, he deleted it. It's not the most important thing in the world, but here it is, since I refuse to let ignorant bozos silence me:
- "That's exactly right. In fact, the first time he removed my paragraph, he claimed it was because it "does not reflect current Practices of Jehovah's Witnesses." Now, he wants to claim "that it doesn't say anything any different that what the article states." That's the Jehovah's Witness game, play every side of the fence and point you to whichever statement is useful at any particular time. If you look at his latest revert(s), he's currently playing on the 'we don't do that' side of the fence. Your characterization is clearly correct per direct quotes.Tommstein 06:59, 14 October 2005 (UTC)"
You can look at his Talk page's history to see it. You probably already saw it, but just making sure.Tommstein 21:23, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
- Yep, I saw it. I don't really understand his reaction to your post-- is it "theocratic warfare" or just standard cult brainwashing? ;) --K. AKA Konrad West TALK 12:59, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
- Your guess about what his problem is is as good as mine, seeing as he never responded to anything we said on the Talk page and just continued reverting with dumbass edit summaries (and has now moved on to not even providing summaries beyond "rv"). Maybe he's not used to non-Jehovah's Witnesses whipping out quotes from his own literature demonstrating him to be full of crap, or even doing research and busting him fudging his own quotes, which in their unfudged state show the opposite of what he wants. He learns from the best; the Watchtower Society is (in)famous for screwing around with quotations, to the point that I think some authors have protested to them for quoting them so wildly out of context. Considering that they don't actually cite the vast majority of their sources, one would not doubt for an instant that they just make up a lot of stuff. The modus operandi of Jehovah's Witnesses is 'our way or the highway,' so it probably aggravates him greatly to not be able to either kick me out and/or go off like a peacock pretending to himself that I'm not actually here. In their own little world, anyone that thinks differently from the latest thing that the Watchtower Society has told them they are to think is just some stupid dumbass to be ignored or, if they're lucky, convinced of the approved "rightthink." He undoubtedly considers me an "apostate" and thus the lowest form of scum on the earth, and would refuse to speak a word to the 'living dead' while convinced of his superiority if he could, but here I am regardless, and I ain't going anywhere (until he buys the Internet and can kick people out like they do in their little religion). Most people that track the Jehovah's Witness articles here are probably Jehovah's Witnesses, so he's undoubtedly not used to being shot down while trying to use Misplaced Pages for "theocratic warfare," or just spreading the standard BS, whatever the case may be. You know, there have been studies done about Jehovah's Witnesses and mental health (sponsored by Satan to discredit them, undoubtedly), which, from skimming through, aren't exactly good news for them. He's probably waiting for God to kill us two evil "opposers" and tools of Satan, not that he would ever tell us publicly. He's gonna be waiting for a long time.Tommstein 06:21, 17 October 2005 (UTC)