Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Laval (talk | contribs) at 12:42, 5 February 2009 (→Misplaced Pages Signpost, January 31, 2009). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Barnstars

Archives

September 2008 October 2008 November 2008 December 2008 January 2009

This page has archives. Sections older than 10 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III.

WP:ORIGINALSYN

Hi Jayen, what are thoughts on the recent revisions to the essay? Cheers, Phenylalanine (talk) 17:08, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

Hi Jayen, I have made further substantial revisions to the essay. Any comments or suggestions? Cheers, Phenylalanine (talk) 13:47, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

With thanks and regards from Pedrero

Jayen: Bravo! Olé! for this:

This looks just like a day's Rawat editing to me, with Momento on 2RR Will on 2RR , Pongostick on 4RR , Surdas on 3RR , and two IP reverts. By all means run checkusers. Now of course you might ask, why is it that Momento is dragged here with his two reverts, rather than Surdas or Pongostick, or indeed Will? And if anyone still cares about writing an encyclopedia rather than counting reverts and hoping for the AE post that will finally get rid of the hated opponent: It's nonsense to say "Prem Rawat, also known as Balyogeshwar". Bal is Hindi for "baby" or "kid". It's a name Rawat had when he was six, and it meant "the kid master yogi". We've discussed that a number of times before as well. It's like saying "Bill Clinton, also known as Little Billy." If there's still people who don't get it, and insist on reverting that back in, it's not for lack of being told. I am tempted to say lock the article or topic-ban the lot of them for a week. Jayen466 02:17, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

Thanks, I hope more people like you will come to Misplaced Pages, and fewer of another kind.--Pedrero (talk) 04:28, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

Anti-Christian sentiment

I hope I did not sound churlish - I apprecioate your comments and was just trying to clarify my own. I agree that good leads just summarize the contents, but in this case I do not htink the lead is doing that. Anyway, I do appreciate your comments on the talk page. Slrubenstein | Talk 14:17, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

Thanks and no prob; it is kind of you to say so. Cheers, Jayen466 14:24, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

Re:

You'll have to ask on the Indian noticeboard. I'm going off on a long break. =Nichalp «Talk»= 18:51, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

thank you

My RFA passed today at 150/48/6. I wanted to thank you for weighing in on the RFA--I will do everything I can to uphold the policies of this site, and try to make it a better place. All the comments, questions, and in particular the opposes I plan to work on and learn from, so that I can hopefully always do the right thing with the huge trust given to me. rootology (C)(T) 08:23, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages Signpost, January 31, 2009

Weekly Delivery

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 20:49, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 21:35, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

Jentzsch

Hi, thanks for your message. I generally agree with you about RS, but the anti-Scientology people on the Net promote this idea of "SP Hall" so much and so strongly, and since there is so much anti-Scientology fervor here on WP, I figured it wouldn't be a problem. After all, Misplaced Pages's Scientology articles are far from balanced or neutral, so why not just put this additional claim about SP Hall since practically everything else claimed on the Net is assumed to be true. Anyway, that the source is not considered to be reliable (and I hope that this is widely held here, and not just by you) is heartening.

I heard about the ArbCom, but I highly doubt it will be able to fix any problems because there is a rampant systemic bias against Scientology throughout Misplaced Pages and the Net. I've tried to fix problems where I've found them, but dealing with the anti-Scientology crowd is extremely difficult. Laval (talk) 12:42, 5 February 2009 (UTC)