Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Michael Tritter - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by JBsupreme (talk | contribs) at 08:05, 12 April 2009. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 08:05, 12 April 2009 by JBsupreme (talk | contribs)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Michael Tritter

Michael Tritter (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Michael Tritter is a minor Character who only appeared in 7 episodes of House MD. this charachter is sufficiently covered in List of House characters, and fails to be notable enough to have it's own article ... MistyWillows  01:29, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

  • Keep- For such a minor character, there's an awful lot of sourced out of universe material. Notability is certainly well established. I see no reason to delete. Umbralcorax (talk) 02:02, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
As sourced in the article, the fact that the character was nominated for an Emmy doesn't hurt the case for notability either. Umbralcorax (talk) 02:07, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
The actor was nominated for an Emmy, not the character. and most the references are just fansite references, You can find as much for every contestant on America's Next Top Model, many of whom have had their articles deleted. Currently, there is an AfD for Katarzyna Dolinska, who do you think is more notable Michael Tritter or Katarzyna Dolinska?
Was there an actual argument there or are you just going to say WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS and expect it sway me?Umbralcorax (talk) 03:10, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Keep, not all of the refs are great, but enough of them are solid to establish notability. Passes WP:N, WP:V, and WP:RS. Besides, I find it hard to believe that a non-notable character could achieve featured article status, as this one did in January. Sarilox (talk) 03:37, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Keep I see Chicago Tribune and NYT in there. (NYT is only passing mention, but Tribune is half-decent.) And, while FA status does not guarantee notability prima facie, the fact that it got this far does send a strong message. rʨanaɢ /contribs 04:00, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
Hunh. It was a featured article. I never even noticed that. Umbralcorax (talk) 04:06, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

  • SPEEDY KEEP SPEEDY KEEP SPEEDY KEEP SPEEDY KEEP SPEEDY KEEP SPEEDY KEEP SPEEDY KEEP SPEEDY KEEP SPEEDY KEEP SPEEDY KEEP SPEEDY KEEP SPEEDY KEEP SPEEDY KEEP SPEEDY KEEP SPEEDY KEEP SPEEDY KEEP SPEEDY KEEP SPEEDY KEEP SPEEDY KEEP SPEEDY KEEP SPEEDY KEEP SPEEDY KEEP SPEEDY KEEP SPEEDY KEEP SPEEDY KEEP SPEEDY KEEP SPEEDY KEEP SPEEDY KEEP SPEEDY KEEP SPEEDY KEEP SPEEDY KEEP SPEEDY KEEP SPEEDY KEEP SPEEDY KEEP SPEEDY KEEP SPEEDY KEEP SPEEDY KEEP SPEEDY KEEP SPEEDY KEEP SPEEDY KEEP SPEEDY KEEP SPEEDY KEEP SPEEDY KEEP SPEEDY KEEP SPEEDY KEEP SPEEDY KEEP SPEEDY KEEP SPEEDY KEEP SPEEDY KEEP SPEEDY KEEP SPEEDY KEEP SPEEDY KEEP SPEEDY KEEP SPEEDY KEEP SPEEDY KEEP SPEEDY KEEP SPEEDY KEEP JBsupreme (talk) 08:05, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
Categories: