This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Fluxbot (talk | contribs) at 15:20, 10 August 2007 (Project status notification). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 15:20, 10 August 2007 by Fluxbot (talk | contribs) (Project status notification)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Please stop adding nonsense to Misplaced Pages. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. --Valermos 06:06, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
- If you continue to add nonsense and personally attack people on wikipedia, you will be banned from editing. --Valermos 06:47, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
- Removing signed user comments is also considered vandalism... Consider this your last warning. --Valermos 07:09, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
I was just removing it because it was stupid and I was tired of vandalism hurting Misplaced Pages.Archjr
Arch Hall Jr. Ugly guy
By our powers combined, Arch Hall Jr and his attempts at stardom will not go unnoticed but shall be known for the grotesque failures for which they are.
Who's with me? Just look what this guy had to say...
Enough of this
|
OK. It is time for the joking to end. You are potentially offending people, both people here in the Misplaced Pages community and the wider readership. What you are doing could be seen as vandalism and you could get blocked from editing Misplaced Pages for it. You might not get another warning before having a block imposed. So be careful and be serious from here on in. |
And stop making personal attacks while you're at it. In fact, I have a question I'd like a straight answer on: do you intend to make serious edits to Misplaced Pages? -- SCZenz 07:24, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
- Here's a serious edit for you - Arch Hall Jr. sucks. That real enough for ya? Archjr
- Not really. I have to say I can't see why, if you plan to use this account only for attacks and vandalism, it shouldn't be blocked. The question, really, is will you or will you not continue to delete material from articles, create hoax pages, and attack users? -- SCZenz 07:48, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
- Gosh, you're right, that sentence was overcomplicated. But, since you know what I meant perfectly well, you can answer the question. -- SCZenz 07:57, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
- YES!!!!(Way to delete my signed comment. Nice double standard.)Archjr
- I was reverting you edit of my comment, which was most definitely inappropriate. I didn't think it necessary to make sure to maintain your snarky comments; if you haven't noticed, I'm in the middle of being lenient and offering you a chance to be productive. -- SCZenz 08:04, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
- YES!!!!(Way to delete my signed comment. Nice double standard.)Archjr
- Gosh, you're right, that sentence was overcomplicated. But, since you know what I meant perfectly well, you can answer the question. -- SCZenz 07:57, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
- Not really. I have to say I can't see why, if you plan to use this account only for attacks and vandalism, it shouldn't be blocked. The question, really, is will you or will you not continue to delete material from articles, create hoax pages, and attack users? -- SCZenz 07:48, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
You're blocked
Since you've declined to give me a straight answer to my question, I've blocked you for 8 hours for your past vandalism. If you intend to use this account productively in the future, saying so would be a good idea. -- SCZenz 08:14, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
WP:CVU status
The Misplaced Pages:Counter-Vandalism Unit project is under consideration to be moved to {{inactive}} and/or {{historical}} status. Another proposal is to delete or redirect the project. You have been identified as a project member and your input as to this matter would be welcomed at WT:CVU#Inactive.3F and at the deletion debate. Thank you! Delivered on behalf of xaosflux 15:20, 10 August 2007 (UTC)