Misplaced Pages

User talk:Sapphic

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Jayron32 (talk | contribs) at 01:26, 16 April 2009 (→WOAH: declined). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 01:26, 16 April 2009 by Jayron32 (talk | contribs) (→WOAH: declined)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Blocked

Per further CU evidence and analysis of edit times, I've blocked you as a sock of User:UC Bill. Ryan Postlethwaite 23:32, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

Huh? --Sapphic (talk) 00:09, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

Okay, after looking into this, you're not entirely crazy Ryan (except perhaps you should be accusing Bill of being my sockpuppet, since I signed up first).. apparently Bill only ever edited while he was at work, and I almost never edit from work, so it was harder than I'd expected to find concurrent edits — but here they are:

  • Bill's edit:
My edit 15 minutes later:
  • Bill's edit:
My edit 10 minutes later:
Bill's edit 42 minutes later:
My edit 10 minutes later:
Bill's edit 15 minutes later:

Hmm.. that's actually it. I didn't include any of the pairs of edits that were within an hour or two of each other, since I'm figuring that's not close enough, since Sapphic-Bill could have run home from work in the intervening time. This also doesn't include the 6,491 edits I made before Bill even signed up. --Sapphic (talk) 01:08, 16 April 2009 (UTC)


WOAH

Umm Ryan, I just noticed this. Removing other people's comments from my talk page is not cool. Especially when it's about the very issue you're now raising. Methinks maybe you're still pissed off because I called you out about your incorrectly accusing me of violating WP:CANVAS? Is this your revenge? I'd say your behavior is unbefitting an admin.. but unfortunately it seems to be the norm among admins. Whatever. --Sapphic (talk) 01:15, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

I'd bring this up at WP/ANI (or wherever) but since you've indef blocked me, that isn't possible. How convenient for you. --Sapphic (talk) 01:17, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sapphic (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Not sure what Ryan is talking about.. Maybe he means "meatpuppet"? I'd been editing for a little over a year before Bill (who admittedly is a RL friend of mine) even signed up.

Decline reason:

Based on the edits made to this talk page which YOU reference yourself above, it is plainly clear that either you or your friends are screwing around. Regardless of whether this is one person using multiple accounts, or you and your friends colluding together to be disruptive, its all the same. See . Jayron32.talk.contribs 01:26, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.