This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Hersfold (talk | contribs) at 21:39, 17 July 2009 (→Sorry for harsh remarks: reply, and general comment on conduct since there have already been a couple issues). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 21:39, 17 July 2009 by Hersfold (talk | contribs) (→Sorry for harsh remarks: reply, and general comment on conduct since there have already been a couple issues)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Sorry for harsh remarks
I'm sorry that I wrote snide remarks and uncivil words. I'm afraid that the helpful comments were written long ago and I felt that they went ignored (this will be evident when I submit my evidence this weekend), and now my frustration with Abd is making me write very harsh messages. Unfortunately, arbs don't know the context and they won't understand what I am talking about, so I'll make a serious effort to be way more neutral and clear, and not use any sarcasm. I will be grateful that people leaves a note on my talk page when they see that I am making unhelpful comments. I won't comment more until I finish the evidence, so I can support my statements properly. --Enric Naval (talk) 14:59, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
- Thank you for your understanding and efforts, Enric. This is undoubtedly going to be a very heated case in any event, and the arbitrators and myself as case clerk would all very much appreciate everyone's commitment to keep careful watch on themselves and their comments. Should anyone notice that a comment has been made which does cross the line, please feel free to email me - I'm not as active during the week as I'd like due to work, but I will be sure to take a look and handle things as necessary as soon as I can. My talk page is similarly open, but if you feel you're being attacked, email may be a better option to reduce drama levels. Thanks again. Hersfold 21:39, 17 July 2009 (UTC)