Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Nishkid64 (talk | contribs) at 00:32, 21 July 2009 (→Blocked: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Welcome

Mire se erdhe ne Misplaced Pages :). --Sarandioti (talk) 23:24, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

On Himara, the reference of Tom Winnifrith states it quite clear. Please stop revert sourced material.Alexikoua (talk) 19:32, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

Who is Tom Winnifrith? Is he a reliable authority on census data on Himara? You and Athenian should stop trolling around with vague sources like this one.

Thank you. I was sure that u r not interested in encyclopedic topics, why dont u write on a block instead?Alexikoua (talk) 19:40, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

I am very interested in encyclopedi articles, and they should not be completed with irredentist shovinistic vague sources that come from you or Athenian or all the other greek editors in wikipedia. I'll be right here to fix all the greek trolling that goes on in albanian related articles.

Sure, the new wiki-Hoxha. Alexikoua (talk) 21:04, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

You know nothing of Hoxha. Stop trolling. Hoxha was a marxist/leninist/stalinist commie whose interest in national issues was minor and only relevant when it kept him and the commies in power. If you don't have any solid arguments besides some vague article by some vague possibly pro greek british writer, you can't claim with certainty to know the ethnic compostion of Himara. All other evidence, in absensce to a bonafied census, points to Himariots being purely Lab Albanians.

Arbitration case

I added you as an involved party in arbitration case about the edit-dispute regions --Sarandioti (talk) 12:22, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

Edit warring

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 14:26, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

u seem to be a less agressive reverter, kindly of u.Alexikoua (talk) 20:50, 9 June 2009 (UTC) why? u killed them?Alexikoua (talk) 21:37, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

We can't all be genocidal so called "greeks".--I Pakapshem (talk) 21:40, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

I warned you that you would be blocked if you continued edit warring, but you failed to heed by warning. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 21:52, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

You should also warng people like Alexikoua and Athenean, since they are doing the same thing. Oh and yeah, I haven't passed the limit of 3 edits per 24 hours in one article.--I Pakapshem (talk) 21:59, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

I have left them warnings on their talk pages. By the way, I blocked you for edit warring, not 3RR. The warning above explicitly states that an editor "may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule." Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 12:40, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

Arbitration request declined

Hello, I Pakapshem. A recent arbitration request in which you were named as a party, "Arbitration request on greek/albanian zones", has been declined by the Arbitration Committee. If this is still an issue that needs resolution, please pursue other areas in dispute resolution first, such as a third opinion, request for comment, or informal or formal mediation (preferably roughly in that order). Should you need assistance getting yourself and the other editors involved started on one of these processes, please feel free to contact me or another administrator. For the Arbitration Committee, Hersfold 17:13, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

Blocked for edit-warring in Souliotes

You are blocked for edit-warring in the aforementioned article. I block you, because I regard what happened in the article yesterday as totally unacceptable: almost 20 reverts in a row from both sides within 20 hours, during which, when one user reverted for the third time (including you), he was succeeded by another one. Your rights to question my action are presented below. You were already once blocked for editwarring, so this time the block is 48 hours. Regards.--Yannismarou (talk) 10:29, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

I Pakapshem (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I did not break the 3RR rule, and I only reverted material that was being removed without a reason since it had 15 sources

Decline reason:

Your block says nothing about 3RR. It was for edit warring. No matter how right you might be, you are not supposed to simply revert and revert. In the future ask for protection. — Daniel Case (talk) 15:02, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I have to report you on edit warring in Himara, your arguments are totally unsourced, I wonder why you insist on that.Alexikoua (talk) 19:17, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

You need to report yourself on edit warring. The only arguments that are unsourced are your and athenean's insistence on adding vasil bollano as famous himariot when he's not a native himariot and he is not famous either.-- (talk) 19:28, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

User notice: temporary 3RR block

You need to look at the whole issue before blocking me. If i am reverting more than 3 times, the other two greek users tag team and revert more than three times in unison.--I Pakapshem (talk) 21:40, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

Regarding reversions made on June 29 2009 to Himarë

You don't seem to be getting the hints. Edit warring is bad. The next block will be indefinite.

Block extended to two weeks. This continuous pattern of edit warring must STOP now. As William M. Connolley noted above, if you continue such behavior in the future, you will be blocked indefinitely. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 20:34, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

You need to look at the whole issue before blocking me. If i am reverting more than 3 times, the other two greek users tag team and revert more than three times in unison.--I Pakapshem (talk) 21:41, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

This does not excuse you from engaging in yet another edit war. Discuss on the talk page before making brash changes to the article. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 22:48, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

Sure it doesn't, but they should receive bans as well. They are gaming the system perfectly, along with other greek users. It's impossible to discuss anything with these users. They always go back on their word. They have clear nationalist agenda to push.--I Pakapshem (talk) 23:56, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

By the way Alexikoua who reported me has has done a whole lot more than three edits on this article http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Cham_Albanians&action=history. It seems like he is edit warring as well.--I Pakapshem (talk) 00:02, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

Chameria & Cham Albanians redirection

Athenean proposed the merge of Chameria with Cham Albanians. Feel free to join the discussion here .--Sarandioti (talk) 22:01, 17 July 2009 (UTC)

Blocked

You continue to edit war, despite the fact that I warned you just a few weeks ago that future edit warring would result in an indefinite block. I have blocked you for 1 month and am officially warning that if you continue this behavior, you will be placed under sanctions as detailed at WP:ARBMAC. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 00:32, 21 July 2009 (UTC)