Misplaced Pages

Academic views on Falun Gong

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Backslash Forwardslash (talk | contribs) at 23:14, 1 August 2009 (Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Academic views on Falun Gong (2nd nomination) closed as keep). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 23:14, 1 August 2009 by Backslash Forwardslash (talk | contribs) (Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Academic views on Falun Gong (2nd nomination) closed as keep)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these messages)

No issues specified. Please specify issues, or remove this template.

(Learn how and when to remove this message)
Falun Gong
Main articles
Media
Related topics
Books

Falun Gong has received a range of scholarly attention — including ethnographic studies, analysis on the teleology of practice and also some studies focusing on its relationship to qigong and Buddhism. Attention from the Academic community has increased following the onset of Chinese Communist Party's persecution of Falun Gong in 1999.

Prominent Falun Gong scholar David Ownby delineates three core themes in the teachings: first, "Li presents his vision both as a return to a lost, or neglected spiritual tradition, and as a major contribution to modern science"; second, "Falun Gong is profoundly moral"; third, "Falun Dafa promises practitioners supernatural powers". Ownby also lists its "Chineseness" as a major part of the practice's appeal.

Falun Gong in relationship with Buddhism and Daoism

The teachings of Falun Gong makes a distinction between fojia, Buddha School, and fojiao, the religion of Buddhism and also the Dao School (daojia) and the religion of Daoism (daojiao). Li states that there are two main systems of Xiu Lian or Cultivation practice the 'Buddha School' and the 'Dao School'. According to Li, Cultivation ways of the Buddha school focus on cultivation of Compassion while the Dao school lays emphasis on cultivation of Truthfulness. In Falun Gong, Truthfulness and Compassion are apprently understood to be aspects of Cosmos's fundamental nature, Zhen-Shan-Ren, translated approximately as Truthfulness, Compassion and Endurance, each of which are said to further unfold into Zhen-Shan-Ren. Thus, cultivation practice whether in the in Buddha School or the Dao School is considered a process of assimilation to this cosmic characteristic.. Li states that there are many cultivation ways in the Dao school and the Buddha School which are unrelated to secular religions and are often handed down from Master to disciple in secret or "has always been practiced quietly, either among the populace or deep in the mountains." Li states that "These kinds of practices have their uniqueness. They need to choose a good disciple—someone with tremendous virtue who is truly capable of cultivating to an advanced level."

References

  1. ^ David Ownby, Falun Gong and the Future of China (2008) Oxford University Press
  2. p 39
  3. Hongzhi, Li Zhuan Falun, Third Translation Edition (Updated March, 2000) USA Internet Version retrieved June 14, 2006
Category: