This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Bluemarine (talk | contribs) at 09:41, 30 August 2009 (→NJ 109: ~~~~). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 09:41, 30 August 2009 by Bluemarine (talk | contribs) (→NJ 109: ~~~~)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)| This is Mitchazenia's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
DYK for Laurence Harbor (NJT station)
|
On August 10, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Laurence Harbor (NJT station), which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
WP:DYK 02:14, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
Tropical Storm Sebastien
I like that sandbox article of Tropical Storm Sebastien in 1995. To me it looks good enough to be an article. So maybe you could make that sandbox article into an article about Tropical Storm Sebastien (1995). Agree? Disagree? --12george1 (talk) 00:09, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
You're invited!
You're invited to the
Philadelphia-area Misplaced Pages Meetup
September 12, 2009
Time: 3 pm
Location: University City, Philadelphia
NOTE: The date and time of this meetup has been changed to accommodate other regional activities.
The purpose of this meeting is to finalize our plans for the Wiki Takes Philadelphia event. We'll discuss logistics, establish jobs, and coordinate with participating groups.
The floor will also be open to discussing other projects relating to the Wiki and Free Culture movement.
Afterward at around 5pm, we'll share dinner and friendly wiki-chat at a local sports bar.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 17:22, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
WikiCup Newsletter XXVIII
| The WikiCup Newsletter | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Delivered by –Juliancolton | at 15:49, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
WikiCup Newsletter XXVIII
| The WikiCup Newsletter | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Delivered by –Juliancolton | at 15:50, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
Wikivoices FAC review
Please sign up here if you can attend the recording session! Awadewit (talk) 16:07, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
New Jersey Routes
I will start working on improving the articles about U.S. and Interstate highways in New Jersey. However, aside from NJ 55, there are still a few major state routes such as 45, 47, 70, 71, and 72 that need to be worked on in addition to the NJTP and GSP articles. Dough4872 (talk) 17:11, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
- Okay, so do you want me to work on the other state routes I listed, the U.S. and Interstate articles, and the two toll roads while you handle the rest of the state routes? (P.S. I hope you get the documents for the former routes) Dough4872 (talk) 17:21, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
- Yeah, that would be helpful - 47 was a work of mine, so was 55, so you can clean it if you want. I made be waiting till September to get the 74 and 85 ones. Btw, when you cite Steve Anderson, cite his sources more than citing him.Mitch32 17:23, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
- I have tried citing some of Anderson's sources in a couple articles before and can do it again. Dough4872 (talk) 17:25, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
- Yeah, that would be helpful - 47 was a work of mine, so was 55, so you can clean it if you want. I made be waiting till September to get the 74 and 85 ones. Btw, when you cite Steve Anderson, cite his sources more than citing him.Mitch32 17:23, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
Another thought, how should I handle the US 1/9 mess. Should the US 1/9 page thoroughly describe the concurrency while the US 1 and US 9 articles thoroughly describe the separate parts with a brief summary of the concurrency? Also, should the junction lists follow suit with the US 1 and US 9 articles only containing the non-concurrent parts while the US 1/9 article contains the junctions along the concurrency. Dough4872 (talk) 17:28, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
- If memory serves - US 1 according to the state is the dominant route along the concurrency - probably should follow that.Mitch32 17:36, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
- However, we have the U.S. Route 1/9 article covering the concurrency. Should this be merged into U.S. Route 1 in New Jersey? I don't think it would be an appropriate move. Dough4872 (talk) 17:51, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
- Hard to say. I know U.S. Route 1 and 9 is a very rare occurrence (like MD 2-4).Mitch32 17:55, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
- In the case of MD 2-4, the information is covered separately in each article. Maybe that should be done here and US 1/9 can become a disambiguation page. However, this move would cause a lot of redundancy. Maybe we should take this discussion to WT:USRD to get other people's opinions. Dough4872 (talk) 18:02, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
- Shrugs - Up to you. :D - Back to the nitty gritty of the discussion :) - Mitch32 18:18, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
- Discussion taken to WT:USRD. Dough4872 (talk) 18:32, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
- Cool.Mitch32 18:42, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
- Discussion taken to WT:USRD. Dough4872 (talk) 18:32, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
- Shrugs - Up to you. :D - Back to the nitty gritty of the discussion :) - Mitch32 18:18, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
- In the case of MD 2-4, the information is covered separately in each article. Maybe that should be done here and US 1/9 can become a disambiguation page. However, this move would cause a lot of redundancy. Maybe we should take this discussion to WT:USRD to get other people's opinions. Dough4872 (talk) 18:02, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
- Hard to say. I know U.S. Route 1 and 9 is a very rare occurrence (like MD 2-4).Mitch32 17:55, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
- However, we have the U.S. Route 1/9 article covering the concurrency. Should this be merged into U.S. Route 1 in New Jersey? I don't think it would be an appropriate move. Dough4872 (talk) 17:51, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
Oh, add NJ 139 to your list, as this is more your alley as well.Mitch32 19:01, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
- By the way, the discussion at WT:USRD seems to be leaning toward my idea and the current situation, with the US 1/9 article covering the concurrency and the separate US 1 and US 9 articles covering the non-concurrent parts with a brief summary of the concurrency. Dough4872 (talk) 18:30, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
- I've seen.Mitch32 18:42, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
I will continue to work on the state route articles for now too since there are still quite a bit. I noticed the list you gave me is missing some current routes, such as I-287, as well as some former state routes such as 1, 9 (merged to CR 506), and 11. Dough4872 (talk) 17:07, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
Shohola Township?
why blech? Auntieruth55 (talk) 00:41, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
State Route 2005
Hey, I was wondering if you could create a map of State Route 2005 (Delaware County, Pennsylvania) since you seem to know a lot about Pennsylvania roads. ~EDDY ~ 19:18, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
- Also, is http://www.pahighways.com considered a reliable source? ~EDDY ~ 19:20, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
- Oh, I'm hardly finished with the article yet; I simply wanted to see if I could find a map of it. Man, I could use a lot of information from Mr. Kitsko, but I guess I'll have to resort to the oil company maps. ~EDDY ~ 19:38, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
RI 99 and RI 78
Oops, thanks for fixing my error in the RI 99 article :) Regarding RI 4, I'm sorry if I made you feel like I was trying to take over the article. That really wasn't my intention...
I see you did a great job improving the Rhode Island Route 78 article - are you going to nominate it at GAN? Cheers, Rai•me 02:43, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
- Okay, I'm glad. But anyway, are you still aiming to make the Route 4 article an FA? Cheers, Rai•me 14:02, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
- That sounds good to me. What else do you think needs to be done to the article to expand/improve it before that point? Unfortunately, I can't seem to find any more useful information from RIDOT's website or independent sources other than Steve Anderson. Cheers, Rai•me 14:47, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
- No, but I can easily go take some this afternoon - I should be able to upload them by tonight. And I just nominated RI 4 at Misplaced Pages:WikiProject U.S. Roads/Assessment/A-Class review/Rhode Island Route 4. Cheers, Rai•me 15:22, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
- Okay, I went this afternoon and took a few photos of the tower. You can see them all at commons:Category:Hannah Robinson Tower. I had never climbed the tower before, so I had never realized how great the view is; the tower itself is also very interesting. Unfortunately, the images of the Newport Bridge from the top of the tower view didn't come out so great... Still, I hope the pictures bring back some of your good memories! Cheers, Rai•me 23:24, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
- No problem :) Rai•me 23:35, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
- That would be great - unfortunately, when I tried to log-in using Java, it failed to connect. I'll try again tomorrow... Cheers, Rai•me 03:19, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
- Ah, got it. Cheers, Rai•me 03:37, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
Talk:State Route 1002 (Lehigh County, Pennsylvania)/GA1
Thanks for getting in touch. I have replied on the reassessment page. GaryColemanFan (talk) 02:40, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
Re: Long time no see
Greetings.
Yeah, I'm still doing some edits, but not a whole lot (since there aren't that many to make).
Hope all is well. :)
20 August 2009 (EST)
Mlaurenti
Oh. I stand corrected. If the highway that you're dealing with is New Jersey, let me know and I'll what I can do. :) Mlaurenti (talk) 15:55, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
Okay. What is wrong with Route 32? Let me know the issues and I can try and tiddy it up (since I happen to take that road often). I'll look at the link you sent me later. Thanks! Mlaurenti (talk) 16:13, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
Alright. I'll see what I can do. Mlaurenti (talk) 13:49, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
Greetings. I tried to clean up the Route 32 article, and I'd like some feed back please (whenever you have a chance). Thanks! Mlaurenti (talk) 13:49, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
Tropical Storm Sebastien (1995)
Ok I can't promise you that I will make it a GA, but if you post it I will try the best I can to make it GA. --12george1 (talk) 23:18, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
List of NJ routes needed to be worked on
I have moved the list of New Jersey routes needed to be worked on that you placed on my talk page to User:Dough4872/NJ routes. Feel free to cross out any routes that you have improved on. Dough4872 (talk) 00:35, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
- Good to hear, that will help in improving articles. Dough4872 (talk) 00:54, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
- Cool. Dough4872 (talk) 23:51, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
Wikivoices
Hello there! Thanks for agreeing to participate in Wikivoices' FAC review episode. This is just a reminder to let you know that the episode starts in about twenty minutes. I am going to be hosting the call, so could you please add 'NuclearWarfare' to your contact list so that I can add you to the discussion? Thanks. I hope to hear you soon. NW (Talk) 18:42, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
Re:Major problems
Hello Mitchazenia, What are you talking about when you refer to "Wyoming List?" Do you mean State highways in Wyoming or List of county routes in Wyoming County, New York?
Thanks for your concern, any problems just let me know. Ngs61 (talk) 02:00, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
Talk:State Route 1002 (Lehigh County, Pennsylvania)/GA1
Hi, have you had a chance to look into the reference in this article? GaryColemanFan (talk) 03:32, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
- NE2 says to ask you instead. GaryColemanFan (talk) 14:15, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
- The part that you removed was the one that was properly sourced. The problem citation is in the third paragraph of the "Tilghman Street" section. GaryColemanFan (talk) 19:20, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
NJ 440
Thanks for reminding me, I will wikilink NJ 169 pending the future article. Dough4872 (talk) 16:18, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
- I don't think I will be able to make it onto IRC today, I have to go. I will try it out tomorrow. Dough4872 (talk) 19:01, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
NJ 109
I agree, with major routes such as NJ 47, county routes are not major. But in routes like 109 that are 3 miles long, county routes are more important. What are 109 or 147 or 83 but county routes that are funded by the state? My thought -- keep county routes as major intersections for one-county state routes. What do you think? ~EDDY ~ 15:04, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
- Okay fine. I still think county routes on steroids (that's what I call one-county state routes) should contain 600-series county routes in major intersections. Besides, some county routes are longer than state routes. ~EDDY ~ 15:19, 28 August 2009 (UTC)\
== On Route 139 to Saint-Suplice DLMI-48) Replacement of Culverts along Route 138
Lava, Quebec, Aug. 6th. The minister of transportation would like to advise motorists of work to take place on culverts along route 138 near Saint-Sulpice, between routes 131 (Saint-Antoine St) and 343 (the montée Saint Sulpice)
Works will begin during the week of August 10th and are planned until the end of the month. During this period, stoplights will direct traffic from both directions.
This year in Quebec, the number of public works on the highway will remain elevated and the the Minister of Transportation would like to remind you to remain vigilant behind the wheel and especially prudent near work areas. Quebec 511 Info Transports can aid in helping to plan your trip or you can consult the Internet www.quebec511.gouv.qc.ca.
Quebec 511 wishes you a safe trip.
SUR LA ROUTE 138 À SAINT-SULPICE (DLMI-48) - REMPLACEMENT DE PONCEAUX SUR LA ROUTE 138 À SAINT-SULPICE
LAVAL, QC, le 6 août /CNW Telbec/ - Le ministère des Transports informe
les usagers de la route qu'il procédera au remplacement de ponceaux sur la route 138 à Saint-Sulpice, entre les routes 131(rue Saint-Antoine) et 343 (montée de Saint-Sulpice).
Les travaux débuteront dans la semaine du 10 août et se poursuivront
jusqu'à la fin du mois. Pendant cette période, la circulation s'effectuera en alternance sur une seule voie et sera gérée par des feux.
Cette année encore, le nombre de chantiers routiers sera très élevé au
Québec. Le ministère des Transports vous invite donc à la plus grande prudence au volant, notamment à l'approche des zones de travaux, et vous suggère de planifier vos déplacements en toute sécurité en communiquant avec Québec 511 Info Transports. Il suffit de composer 5 1 1 ou de vous rendre sur le site Web au www.quebec511.gouv.qc.ca.
Québec 511 Info Transports vous souhaite : «Bonne route !»