This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Fol de rol troll (talk | contribs) at 17:58, 3 August 2009 (AfD nomination of David Crawford (colonel). (TW)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 17:58, 3 August 2009 by Fol de rol troll (talk | contribs) (AfD nomination of David Crawford (colonel). (TW))(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Please note: Comments left by anonymous editors may be removed without warning. Please create an account or log in if you wish to engage in a meaningful discussion.
Welcome!
Overcoming the Paint
Ouch. I can't believe how many times I read by that without catching it....--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 01:15, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of David Crawford (colonel)
The article David Crawford (colonel) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Article doesn't really suggest that person acheives any aspect of notability. No sources used.
While all contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fol de rol troll (talk) 12:00, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
Articles for deletion nomination of David Crawford (colonel)
I have nominated David Crawford (colonel), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/David Crawford (colonel). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Fol de rol troll (talk) 17:58, 3 August 2009 (UTC)