Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 198.161.174.222 (talk) at 19:54, 15 October 2009 (→Arbcom discussion: constructive proposals). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

{{archive box| Arch1}

aldebaran

dobra, niech se pisze chlopak, bo widze ze nie ma nic leprzego do roboty ...ale powiem ci jedno. Piszac tak jak pisze, nie tylko kompromituje siebie ale tez nas Polakow, bo ci wszyscy ktorzy beda te jego pseudo-angielskie wywody czytac utwierdza sie tylko w szeroko juz uznanym przekonaniu ze Polacy to idioci, ktorych stac w najleprzym razie na kaleczenie jezyka Angielskiego, i na niezrozumiale dukanie. Pozatym nie rozume chlop po polsku i przypuszczam ze uzywa programu do tlumacznia. Wiele rzeczy po prostu jest napisanych niezgodnie z tym co jest oryginalnie na polskiej Wikipedji, z ktorej sciaga doslownie wszystko. A wszystkiego tego co on naduka nie da sie ot tak naprawic bo sadzi byki takie ze czasami sie plakac chce, i nie mowie o pisowni, bo pal to szesc, ale o skladni ktora moze przeinaczyc znaczenie zdania, zwlaszcza w angielskim.

Na zakonczenie, ja tez bym mogl zaczac pisac na hiszpanskiej stronie ale mam wystarczajoco duzo taktu ze wiem ze kalecze ten jezyk i to co pisze bylo by masakra przykra do czytania. Napewno bym nie zmienial artykolow napisanych przez tych ktorzy po Hiszpansku mowia plynnie... bylo by to w moim mniemaniu poprostu bezczelne. Ale jak ci jego proza nie przeszkadza to coz, ja cie nie przekonam ze wiecej szkodzi niz pomaga. Powiedz mi czy Ebonics tez uwazasz za piekny wyraz ekspresji? then... word dog. Them polish king fools was fo sho some mad stupid nikaz, and git Sheniquah's ass back ova' heeah, befo I get crazy on that Wiki bool shizel, that's my word, ya'll betta recognize!  ;)

Pozdrawiam --Rob Aleksandrowicz (talk) 20:49, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

What do you think?

]

Important

] ]

Notification

Henryk Ehrlich

It is DYKable; don't forget to nominate it (and similar quality articles). --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 00:09, 29 September 2009 (UTC)

Yeah, sometimes it takes me longer to think of the proper hook than to actually write the article.radek (talk) 06:39, 29 September 2009 (UTC)

Radeksz, let me know when that happens. Thats a good accomplishment that deserves mention on the Jewish Labour Bund Task Force.--Eliscoming1234 (talk) 01:53, 5 October 2009 (UTC)

Topic ban

In response to your attempts at dispute intensification at the recent WP:AN thread on Russavia, Radeksz, you are hereby topic banned from Russavia, except for your participation in the arbitration case, for the duration of that case. You are not to comment on, report on, wikihound, or otherwise annoy Russavia. Should Russavia show the extreme poor judgement of engaging Radeksz, please leave me a diff and I will deal with that. Jehochman 12:56, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

You know what's crazy? I'm actually going to *abide* by my topic ban. How's that for total insanity?radek (talk) 17:51, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

Thank you! You have my respect. Jehochman 18:02, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

Did You Know problem

Hello! Your submission of Michał Klepfisz at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Art LaPella (talk) 22:55, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

Expanded. Should be good now.radek (talk) 06:04, 3 October 2009 (UTC)

Kultur Lige

Almost DYKable... will you finish it? --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 23:38, 4 October 2009 (UTC)

Radeksz, let me know when that happens. Thats a good accomplishment that deserves mention on the Jewish Labour Bund Task Force.--Eliscoming1234 (talk) 01:25, 5 October 2009 (UTC)

Clerking actions

Radek - I am very sympathetic to all the frustration levels. Hence although it is my responsibility to enforce decorum, I am trying to do as quietly as possible and without creating any additional drama. Regards Manning (talk) 11:38, 5 October 2009 (UTC)

About Caruk

Source: następnie przytacza wyniki badań „krajoznawcy" Jarosława Caruka, który - zbierając relacje od miejscowych Ukraińców - „ustalił" liczbę 836 zamordowanych przez Polaków Ukraińców w rejonie włodzimierskim i 673 w rejonie uściłuskim 57. Dla tych fabrykacji i krętactw nie ma żadnego uzasadnienia w dobrze rozpoznanych wydarzeniach. I have added two paragraphs about Caruk to Władysław Siemaszko. Motyka mention about it too. Caruk isnt reliable source--Paweł5586 (talk) 07:24, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

Is this from Siemaszko's book? In that case it's a bit of a "she-said-he-said". Do you have the actual quote from Motyka or other clearly reliable sources?radek (talk) 07:27, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Henryk Ehrlich

Hello! Your submission of Henryk Ehrlich at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! SoWhy 09:07, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

Your reverting,

good sir, is discussed here: . Anti-Nationalist (talk) 01:41, 8 October 2009 (UTC)

DYK for Kultur Lige

On October 8, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Kultur Lige, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

≈ Chamal  ¤ 06:28, 8 October 2009 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Hirsh Lekert

Hello! Your submission of Hirsh Lekert at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 04:46, 9 October 2009 (UTC)

DYK for Victor Alter

On October 10, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Victor Alter, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (see the pageview stats) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Thanks! Note:Halloween DYK is limited to top 32 articles ;-) Victuallers (talk) 06:29, 10 October 2009 (UTC)

DYK for Hirsh Lekert

On October 10, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Hirsh Lekert, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (see the pageview stats) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

SoWhy 13:29, 10 October 2009 (UTC)

DYK for Michał Klepfisz

On October 10, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Michał Klepfisz, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

SoWhy 19:29, 10 October 2009 (UTC)

Your provocations and editwarring

Yet another attempt to provoke me into violating Sandstein's 1RR: Your revert of my edit, in which you oversize an image, claim that a Polish name for a suburb in German-speaking Danzig, and state that I "insert obviously POV material" in my edit summary(!). Do I have to add references for my POV and your POV into my edit summaries now? And those century old massacre fairy tales were and are nothing but nationalistic Polish propaganda claims, made in the 14th century, in pre- and post WW2 Poland, and still by 21st century EU members. The 700th anniversary in 2008 has passed, 2009 is almost over, and still the official city website claims the Teutonic Knights ..., having captured the castle in 1308 butchered the population. Since then the event is known as "the Gdansk slaughter ". Just go on, folks, ride that dead horse another mile in front of everyone. -- Matthead  Discuß   21:54, 10 October 2009 (UTC)

Matthead...I'm shaking my head with disbelieve when I look at your super aggressive comments...I don't know how you are getting away with this.--Jacurek (talk) 02:06, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

DYK for Henryk Ehrlich

On October 11, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Henryk Ehrlich, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

JamieS93 15:29, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

Arbcom discussion deleted

Your lengthy statement about Topic banning at Misplaced Pages talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Eastern European mailing list/Proposed decision has been deleted for being irrelevant to the Proposed decision page. However the diff of your evidence (and Russavia's response) has been logged and submitted to Arbcom for review. My submission of the diff is not an agreement that your statement has merit. Manning (talk) 08:40, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

Alright, thanks - I wasn't sure where to put, since this case has sprawled so much.radek (talk) 08:42, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

Re evidence. Yes, put it in your evidence section. Manning (talk) 12:42, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

Arbcom discussion: constructive proposals

The discussion has ballooned way past my ability to respond to you coherently without interrupting the existing discussion.

All I wanted to say was that my use of the term "mud-slinging" with regards to Poitrus is due to his own laments concerning it. I have observed him in the past decrying mud-slinging headed his way (he even has a couple essays on the subject). Its a semi-deroggatory term, I suppose, that has the benifit of actually fitting what going on. He would call it baseless accusations, his opponents would call it justified concerns. Until it was proven either way, its just mud-slinging. So without actually accusing him (or anyone else, specifically) of anything, I can still say that a topic-ban would help him escape the mud-slinging. Generally because if he is topic banned and his 'opponents' continued their mud-slinging towards him on the topic, then thats about as official of harassment as it gets. 198.161.174.222 (talk) 14:48, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

I understand your point but that seems like a very minor consideration, considering how much damage a topic ban for Piotrus would do to Misplaced Pages.radek (talk) 14:51, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

I only wished to clarify my use of the above term. I continue to stand by my previous statements concerning the potential damage to wikipedia and Piotrus' ability to continue contributing. 198.161.174.222 (talk) 19:54, 15 October 2009 (UTC)