This is an old revision of this page, as edited by CJCurrie (talk | contribs) at 21:20, 13 December 2005. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 21:20, 13 December 2005 by CJCurrie (talk | contribs)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)He was one of those hereditary peers expelled from the Upper House by the Blair Labour government. The Lord Sudeley has been active in the Monday Club, a traditional conservative group since the 1960s.
- This is one of several skewed edits written by the same editor or editors. See also Western Goals Institute for more information. CJCurrie 02:14, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
I have followed CJCurrie here. The above is a factual statement. its not a question of whether Mr.Currie likes it. Its a question of whether it is true, or not. Just how does he get away with these comments? Robert I 10:10, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
- The first sentence quoted is not strictly NPOV. David | Talk 20:51, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
Perhaps not, but it struck me as a bit skewed (the word "expelled" seems somewhat contentious). My main objection was to the second sentence, in any event. CJCurrie 20:54, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
- That's what I was saying - it's not neutral to refer to someone as being expelled because it implies a punishment and a forceful move. Best to use a neutral phrase such as "He was among the hereditary peers whose membership of the House of Lords ceased in 1999.". David | Talk 12:39, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
I misread your initial post, sorry. CJCurrie 21:20, 13 December 2005 (UTC)