Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license.
Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat.
We can research this topic together.
This Barnstar is hereby rewarded to you for your hard work in editing biased articles and yout tolerance with the folks at Misplaced Pages Ssd175 06:48, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
The History Barnstar
I don't get this whole barnstar thing ... but I've now spent hours reading up on the mess you have been involved in, so here's a token of admiration for your tireless yet futile attempts to rid Misplaced Pages of its anti-Palestinian bias. --Servant Saber 22:12, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
The Purple Barnstar
For surviving the totally uncalled for attempts at impugning your character and continuing your excellent contributions to the project. Italiavivi 21:11, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
For defending Misplaced Pages from being used as an Israeli public relations tool against Palestine. Luqman Skye (talk) 09:24, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
The Original Barnstar
This Barnstar is hereby award to PalestineRemembered in recognition of his/her boundarylessness and outstanding contributions to various topics across Misplaced Pages. Your hard work, thoughtfulness, and diligence are appreciated. Henrywinklestein (talk) 02:48, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
Sand-box pages
PR Cheating Editors - some day, it will be necessary to name and shame editors who give every sign of deliberate cheating. Sadly, the precedent of an editor collecting short segments of other people's statements on his UserPage ceased abruptly in July 2008. I trust this is will not be used as an excuse to protect cheats.
PR Block History - boring and currently incomplete. Some/many of my blocks are patently collusive, vindictive and uncalled for. In some cases I have appealed successfully, in most cases I don't appeal.
PR Original Research - obvious common sense is regularily dismissed as "Original Research", and of course, if it's included in articles, that's what it is. But in many other cases, evidence that is necessary for understanding a situation, and clearly not "surprising" in any way, is rejected as WP:OR for entirely POV reasons (it's one of the milder forms of obstruction and cheating).